实用医技杂志
實用醫技雜誌
실용의기잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL MEDICAL TECHNIQUES
2014年
12期
1266-1268
,共3页
罗浩元%刘集鸿%雷艳梅%梁金霞%曾涛
囉浩元%劉集鴻%雷豔梅%樑金霞%曾濤
라호원%류집홍%뢰염매%량금하%증도
电化学发光%性能评价%质量控制%质量改进
電化學髮光%性能評價%質量控製%質量改進
전화학발광%성능평개%질량공제%질량개진
Electrochemiluminescence%Performance evaluation%Quality control%Quality improvement
目的:应用六西格玛(6σ)质量管理方法对Roche Cobas E601电化学发光免疫分析系统检测项目的性能进行量化,并设计各项目的质量控制方案,指导质量持续改进。方法根据σ=[允许总误差(TEa)-偏倚(Bias)]/变异系数(CV),计算14个检测项目的σ水平,评价各项目的分析性能。其中TEa以卫生部临床检验中心(NCCL)室间质量评价的评价标准,Bias以本室参加NCCL室间质量评价的平均偏倚计算所得,本室室内质量控制日间不精密度(CV%)反映不精密度。根据Westgard等对σ值的说明,制定个体化的室内质量控制方案;同时计算各项目的质量目标指数(QGI),对于性能未达到6σ的项目,查找导致性能不佳的主要原因,并确立性能改进的方案。结果14个检测项目的总性能σ水平为3.80~9.19,平均σ=6.20,σ≥6、5、4、3的分别占42.9%、21.4%、28.6%、7.1%;分析性能未达到6σ的项目中,75%需要优先改进精密度。结论6σ质量标准能对电化学发光免疫分析系统的性能作出全面的评价,对设计个体化的质量控制方案和指导质量持续改进具有重要意义。
目的:應用六西格瑪(6σ)質量管理方法對Roche Cobas E601電化學髮光免疫分析繫統檢測項目的性能進行量化,併設計各項目的質量控製方案,指導質量持續改進。方法根據σ=[允許總誤差(TEa)-偏倚(Bias)]/變異繫數(CV),計算14箇檢測項目的σ水平,評價各項目的分析性能。其中TEa以衛生部臨床檢驗中心(NCCL)室間質量評價的評價標準,Bias以本室參加NCCL室間質量評價的平均偏倚計算所得,本室室內質量控製日間不精密度(CV%)反映不精密度。根據Westgard等對σ值的說明,製定箇體化的室內質量控製方案;同時計算各項目的質量目標指數(QGI),對于性能未達到6σ的項目,查找導緻性能不佳的主要原因,併確立性能改進的方案。結果14箇檢測項目的總性能σ水平為3.80~9.19,平均σ=6.20,σ≥6、5、4、3的分彆佔42.9%、21.4%、28.6%、7.1%;分析性能未達到6σ的項目中,75%需要優先改進精密度。結論6σ質量標準能對電化學髮光免疫分析繫統的性能作齣全麵的評價,對設計箇體化的質量控製方案和指導質量持續改進具有重要意義。
목적:응용륙서격마(6σ)질량관리방법대Roche Cobas E601전화학발광면역분석계통검측항목적성능진행양화,병설계각항목적질량공제방안,지도질량지속개진。방법근거σ=[윤허총오차(TEa)-편의(Bias)]/변이계수(CV),계산14개검측항목적σ수평,평개각항목적분석성능。기중TEa이위생부림상검험중심(NCCL)실간질량평개적평개표준,Bias이본실삼가NCCL실간질량평개적평균편의계산소득,본실실내질량공제일간불정밀도(CV%)반영불정밀도。근거Westgard등대σ치적설명,제정개체화적실내질량공제방안;동시계산각항목적질량목표지수(QGI),대우성능미체도6σ적항목,사조도치성능불가적주요원인,병학립성능개진적방안。결과14개검측항목적총성능σ수평위3.80~9.19,평균σ=6.20,σ≥6、5、4、3적분별점42.9%、21.4%、28.6%、7.1%;분석성능미체도6σ적항목중,75%수요우선개진정밀도。결론6σ질량표준능대전화학발광면역분석계통적성능작출전면적평개,대설계개체화적질량공제방안화지도질량지속개진구유중요의의。
Objective Application of 6 sigma(6σ) quality standard to quality of Roche Cobas E601 electroche-miluminescence (ECL) test item analysis performance, and design the appropriate quality control strategy to improve quality control. Methods The sigma value of 14 items were calculated according the equation σ=(TEa-Bias)/coefficient of variation (CV) to reflect the performance of analytic phase. Define the analytical quality requirement for the test in the form of a total allowable error (TEa) by reference NCCL proficiency testing criteria and determine the imprecision and inaccuracy of each item. The quality control strategy was designed accordingly. Quality goal index(QGI) was calculated to find the cause of any error for the items which was below 6σ and improved the strategy. Results The value of σ was between 3.80-9.19 and average was 6.20, 42.9%, 21.4%, 28.6% and 7.1% of all 14 items were over 6, 5, 4 and 3 sigma metrics respectively with the averaged. The accuracy of 75% items required improved which value was below 6σ. Conclusion Six σ quality standard could comprehensively evaluated ECL test item analysis performance , it is of great significance to design individualized quality control plan and quality improvement.