CAJ | 학술논문

本文分析了中药代煎的应用调查数据，以及有关代煎方法与传统方法比较研究的文献。两种煎药方法各有利弊，各有市场。以理化手段评价两种方法的文献因评价指标不同而有不同结果，而以药效药理手段为评价标准的研究较少。认为仍需针对两种煎药方式探讨适合的研究方法，并对中药代煎业务加强监管。
본문분석료중약대전적응용조사수거，이급유관대전방법여전통방법비교연구적문헌。량충전약방법각유리폐，각유시장。이이화수단평개량충방법적문헌인평개지표불동이유불동결과，이이약효약리수단위평개표준적연구교소。인위잉수침대량충전약방식탐토괄합적연구방법，병대중약대전업무가강감관。
The survey data on the application of TCM decoction services and relevant literatures on the comparative studies between TCM decoction by patients themselves and by TCM decoction services (by machine) were analyzed. There exited both advantages and disadvantages and respective markets in two methods for TCM decoction. Different results occurred due to the different criteria when two methods were assessed by physical and chemical means, and the study on the efifcacy of different decoctions was a little when the methods were evaluated by pharmacology and pharmacodynamics. Appropriate research methods and criteria for the efifcacy evaluation of two methods should be still explored and the supervision of TCM decoction services should be strengthen.