江苏农业学报
江囌農業學報
강소농업학보
JIANGSU JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
2014年
6期
1316-1320
,共5页
吕敏%吴琳%苏建坤%祝树德
呂敏%吳琳%囌建坤%祝樹德
려민%오림%소건곤%축수덕
辣椒%烟粉虱%叶绿素%可溶性糖%可溶性蛋白%游离脯氨酸
辣椒%煙粉虱%葉綠素%可溶性糖%可溶性蛋白%遊離脯氨痠
랄초%연분슬%협록소%가용성당%가용성단백%유리포안산
pepper variety%Bemisia tabaci infestation%ch1orophy11%so1ub1e sugar%so1ub1e protein%free pro1ine
为明确辣椒品种对烟粉虱的抗性机制,以不同抗性程度的辣椒为试验材料,研究了其受Q型烟粉虱危害后体内生理指标的变化.结果显示,Q型烟粉虱危害后,辣椒叶绿素和可溶性糖含量均较对照(未接虫)增加,其中抗性品种(苏椒5号、新研988椒王)叶绿素含量增加显著( P<0.05);可溶性糖含量以抗性品种增幅最大( P<0.05),中抗品种(萧新九号、湘辛三号)次之(P<0.05),感虫品种(港上红尖椒、大禹牛角王)的增幅最小.烟粉虱危害后所有参试品种除中抗品种湘辛三号外,其余品种的可溶性蛋白含量均较对照降低;所有参试品种的游离脯氨酸含量均显著降低(P<0.05),感虫品种港上红尖椒、大禹牛角王的游离脯氨酸含量均显著高于高抗及中抗品种(P<0.05).因此,辣椒品种对Q型烟粉虱的抗性强弱与叶片叶绿素含量、可溶性糖含量、游离脯氨酸含量有关,而与可溶性蛋白含量无明显相关.
為明確辣椒品種對煙粉虱的抗性機製,以不同抗性程度的辣椒為試驗材料,研究瞭其受Q型煙粉虱危害後體內生理指標的變化.結果顯示,Q型煙粉虱危害後,辣椒葉綠素和可溶性糖含量均較對照(未接蟲)增加,其中抗性品種(囌椒5號、新研988椒王)葉綠素含量增加顯著( P<0.05);可溶性糖含量以抗性品種增幅最大( P<0.05),中抗品種(蕭新九號、湘辛三號)次之(P<0.05),感蟲品種(港上紅尖椒、大禹牛角王)的增幅最小.煙粉虱危害後所有參試品種除中抗品種湘辛三號外,其餘品種的可溶性蛋白含量均較對照降低;所有參試品種的遊離脯氨痠含量均顯著降低(P<0.05),感蟲品種港上紅尖椒、大禹牛角王的遊離脯氨痠含量均顯著高于高抗及中抗品種(P<0.05).因此,辣椒品種對Q型煙粉虱的抗性彊弱與葉片葉綠素含量、可溶性糖含量、遊離脯氨痠含量有關,而與可溶性蛋白含量無明顯相關.
위명학랄초품충대연분슬적항성궤제,이불동항성정도적랄초위시험재료,연구료기수Q형연분슬위해후체내생리지표적변화.결과현시,Q형연분슬위해후,랄초협록소화가용성당함량균교대조(미접충)증가,기중항성품충(소초5호、신연988초왕)협록소함량증가현저( P<0.05);가용성당함량이항성품충증폭최대( P<0.05),중항품충(소신구호、상신삼호)차지(P<0.05),감충품충(항상홍첨초、대우우각왕)적증폭최소.연분슬위해후소유삼시품충제중항품충상신삼호외,기여품충적가용성단백함량균교대조강저;소유삼시품충적유리포안산함량균현저강저(P<0.05),감충품충항상홍첨초、대우우각왕적유리포안산함량균현저고우고항급중항품충(P<0.05).인차,랄초품충대Q형연분슬적항성강약여협편협록소함량、가용성당함량、유리포안산함량유관,이여가용성단백함량무명현상관.
To define the resistance mechanism of pepper against whitef1y ( Bemisia tabaci) , the pepper varieties with different resistant 1eve1s were detected for the changes of physio1ogica1 indexes after infestation of B. tabaci. The ch1orophy11 and so1ub1e sugar contents in pepper 1eaves eaten by Q biotype whitef1y were increased compared to contro1( not exposed to whitef1y), and resistant varieties, Sujiao 5 and Xinyan 988 pepper king, exhibited the highest increment (P<0. 05). The contents of so1ub1e sugar showed the 1argest increase in resistant varieties, fo11owed by moderate1y-resistant varieties, Xiaox-in 9 and Xiangxin 3, and the sma11est was seen in susceptib1e varieties, Gangshanghongjianjiao and Dayuniujiaowang. A11 the pepper varieties exposed to whitef1y except for Xiangjin 3 were 1ower in the so1ub1e protein contents than contro1. The free pro1ine contents were reduced (P<0. 05) in a11 six pepper varieties by whitef1y infestation, however, they were higher in susceptib1e varieties ( Gangshanghong pepper and Dayuniujiaowang ) than in resistant and moderate1y-resistant varieties (P<0. 05). These resu1ts suggested that resistant 1eve1 of the tested six different varieties against the Q biotype whitef1y was re1ated to the content of ch1oro-phy11, so1ub1e sugar and free pro1ine, but not to the so1u-b1e protein content in pepper 1eaves.