CAJ | 학술논문

明代的文学复古运动从明初一直持续到明中后期，几乎贯穿整个有明一代，以初期吴越、闽中文人和中后期的前后七子为主要代表。与此相对的是明代的经学，“其学各抒心得，及其弊也肆。空谈臆断，考证必疏。”文学和经学迥然不同的学术研究走向，与“台阁体”影响、陆王心学压倒程朱理学及前代经学研究积弊有关。少数读书人既作为文学家，又作为治经学者，在文学和经学方面分别作出“复古”和“创新”（即“离道”）的创作和研究抉择，很大程度上又是由其所处的不同环境造成。
명대적문학복고운동종명초일직지속도명중후기，궤호관천정개유명일대，이초기오월、민중문인화중후기적전후칠자위주요대표。여차상대적시명대적경학，“기학각서심득，급기폐야사。공담억단，고증필소。”문학화경학형연불동적학술연구주향，여“태각체”영향、륙왕심학압도정주이학급전대경학연구적폐유관。소수독서인기작위문학가，우작위치경학자，재문학화경학방면분별작출“복고”화“창신”（즉“리도”）적창작화연구결택，흔대정도상우시유기소처적불동배경조성。
The Retro Movement of Literary lasted from the early stage to the middle and later periods of Ming Dynasty, almost throughout the whole dynasty. The chief leaders of this movement in the early periods are those literatis who especially lived in Wuyue and Fujian,and that in the rest periods are the“QianHouQiZi”.At the same time, the opinion that “Each doctrine expresses their own views, the disadvantages are obvious. Only talk and guess, the research must be incomplete” of the Confucian Classics was just on the contrary to this movement. The different direction of research between Literature and Confucian Classics related to the Taige Style, the philosophy of the mind by Lu and Wang and the disadvantages of the Confucian Classics research before. Few intellectuals studied not only as litterateurs but also as scholars on Confucian Classics. They chose retro in Literature and deviation in Confucian Classics, which was caused by different social environment largely.