重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
34期
4640-4642
,共3页
李钰%孙昌朋%林萍%陈望忠
李鈺%孫昌朋%林萍%陳望忠
리옥%손창붕%림평%진망충
亚健康%科技期刊编辑%问卷调查
亞健康%科技期刊編輯%問捲調查
아건강%과기기간편집%문권조사
sub-health%scientific journal editors%questionnaires
目的:了解科技期刊编辑的亚健康现状。方法采用便利抽样的方法抽取1200名科技期刊编辑进行现场调查。回收问卷1149份,回收率为95.75%,排除从事科技期刊编辑工作不满1年者、现患疾病者和资料缺漏20%以上者的问卷,收回有效问卷895份。结果其中亚健康者729人,亚健康发生率为81.5%。科技期刊编辑亚健康主要表现在记忆力差、活力减退、疲劳、肩或腿麻木僵硬、注意力不集中。科技期刊编辑不同性别、文化程度、职务、每周工作时间、早餐、锻炼、睡眠、噪声、家人对工作支持态度的亚健康发生率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论科技期刊编辑亚健康状况不容乐观,卫生部门、期刊和编辑自身都应引起重视。
目的:瞭解科技期刊編輯的亞健康現狀。方法採用便利抽樣的方法抽取1200名科技期刊編輯進行現場調查。迴收問捲1149份,迴收率為95.75%,排除從事科技期刊編輯工作不滿1年者、現患疾病者和資料缺漏20%以上者的問捲,收迴有效問捲895份。結果其中亞健康者729人,亞健康髮生率為81.5%。科技期刊編輯亞健康主要錶現在記憶力差、活力減退、疲勞、肩或腿痳木僵硬、註意力不集中。科技期刊編輯不同性彆、文化程度、職務、每週工作時間、早餐、鍛煉、睡眠、譟聲、傢人對工作支持態度的亞健康髮生率比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論科技期刊編輯亞健康狀況不容樂觀,衛生部門、期刊和編輯自身都應引起重視。
목적:료해과기기간편집적아건강현상。방법채용편리추양적방법추취1200명과기기간편집진행현장조사。회수문권1149빈,회수솔위95.75%,배제종사과기기간편집공작불만1년자、현환질병자화자료결루20%이상자적문권,수회유효문권895빈。결과기중아건강자729인,아건강발생솔위81.5%。과기기간편집아건강주요표현재기억력차、활력감퇴、피로、견혹퇴마목강경、주의력불집중。과기기간편집불동성별、문화정도、직무、매주공작시간、조찬、단련、수면、조성、가인대공작지지태도적아건강발생솔비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론과기기간편집아건강상황불용악관,위생부문、기간화편집자신도응인기중시。
Objective To understand the sub-health status of scientific journal editors.Methods Convenience sampling was used in the study,the survey of 1 200 scientific journal editors was conducted on-site investigations.1 149 questionnaires were re-turned with a recovery of 95.75%,excluding those engaged in scientific journal editors less than one year,those suffering from the disease and whose questionnaires were more than 20% of data was missing,895 questionnaires were recoveried effectively.Results Among them,729 were sub-health people with an incidence of 81.5%.Poor memory,vitality loss,fatigue,stiff shoulder or leg numbness and inability to concentrate were the main manifestations of sub-health scientific journal editors.There were significant differences in the sub-health incidence of scientific journal editors with different gender,education,position,weekly working time, breakfast,exercise,sleep,noise and attitude of family to support their work (P<0.05).Conclusion Scientific journal editors′health situation is not quite optimistic,so the health sector,editorial departments and editors themselves should pay attention to the issue.