安徽医学
安徽醫學
안휘의학
ANHUI MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
12期
1728-1729,1730
,共3页
腹腔镜胆总管切开探查术%一期缝合%T 管引流%胆总管结石
腹腔鏡膽總管切開探查術%一期縫閤%T 管引流%膽總管結石
복강경담총관절개탐사술%일기봉합%T 관인류%담총관결석
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration%A suture%T tube drainage%Choledocholithiasis
目的:分析腹腔镜胆总管探查后一期胆管缝合治疗胆总管结石的临床效果。方法将100例胆总管结石患者的随机分为观察组与对照组,每组50例患者。观察组患者采取腹腔镜胆总管切开探查术后胆管一期缝合,对照组患者采取腹腔镜胆总管切开探查术后 T 管引流。对比分析两组患者的临床疗效。结果观察组患者与对照组患者在手术时间、手术中出血量及术后并发症的发生率等差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);观察组患者的肛门排气时间及术后住院时间均低于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论临床上应严格把握腹腔镜胆总管切开探查术后胆管一期缝合的适应证,在满足一期缝合的条件时,腹腔镜胆总管切开探查术后胆管一期缝合的引流疗效优于腹腔镜胆总管切开探查术后 T 管引流。
目的:分析腹腔鏡膽總管探查後一期膽管縫閤治療膽總管結石的臨床效果。方法將100例膽總管結石患者的隨機分為觀察組與對照組,每組50例患者。觀察組患者採取腹腔鏡膽總管切開探查術後膽管一期縫閤,對照組患者採取腹腔鏡膽總管切開探查術後 T 管引流。對比分析兩組患者的臨床療效。結果觀察組患者與對照組患者在手術時間、手術中齣血量及術後併髮癥的髮生率等差異無統計學意義(P >0.05);觀察組患者的肛門排氣時間及術後住院時間均低于對照組患者,差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。結論臨床上應嚴格把握腹腔鏡膽總管切開探查術後膽管一期縫閤的適應證,在滿足一期縫閤的條件時,腹腔鏡膽總管切開探查術後膽管一期縫閤的引流療效優于腹腔鏡膽總管切開探查術後 T 管引流。
목적:분석복강경담총관탐사후일기담관봉합치료담총관결석적림상효과。방법장100례담총관결석환자적수궤분위관찰조여대조조,매조50례환자。관찰조환자채취복강경담총관절개탐사술후담관일기봉합,대조조환자채취복강경담총관절개탐사술후 T 관인류。대비분석량조환자적림상료효。결과관찰조환자여대조조환자재수술시간、수술중출혈량급술후병발증적발생솔등차이무통계학의의(P >0.05);관찰조환자적항문배기시간급술후주원시간균저우대조조환자,차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。결론림상상응엄격파악복강경담총관절개탐사술후담관일기봉합적괄응증,재만족일기봉합적조건시,복강경담총관절개탐사술후담관일기봉합적인류료효우우복강경담총관절개탐사술후 T 관인류。
Objective To investigate and analyze the clinical results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after a suture cho-ledocholithiasis.Methods The clinical data of 100 cases with common bile duct stones who underwent laparoscopic common bile duct explo-ration in our hospital from January 2011 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into observation group and con-trol group in chronological order,with 50 cases in each group.The patients in the observation group took laparoscopic common bile duct explo-ration bile duct a suture,while those in control group received laparoscopic common bile duct exploration postoperative T-tube drainage.The clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients was comparatively analyzed.Results There was no statistically significant difference in the op-erative time,blood loss and the incidence of postoperative complications in patients of the observation group and the control group(P >0.05);however the difference in anal exhaust time,hospital costs and length of hospital stay after surgery in the observation group was statisti-cally significant compared with those in the control group(P <0.05).Conclusion In the clinical practice the indications of postoperative biliary a suture after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration should be strictly grasped.When the conditions of a suture are met,laparo-scopic common bile duct exploration postoperative biliary drainage of a suture can achieve better efficacy than laparoscopic common bile duct exploration postoperative T-tube drainage.