中国民康医学
中國民康醫學
중국민강의학
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF CHINSEE PEOPLE HEALTH
2014年
23期
12-14,20
,共4页
进食障碍%家庭负担会谈量表%信度%效度
進食障礙%傢庭負擔會談量錶%信度%效度
진식장애%가정부담회담량표%신도%효도
Eating disorder%Family burden interview schedule%Reliability%Validity
目的：：探讨家庭负担会谈量表(FBIS)在进食障碍患者的家庭负担评价中的信度和效度。方法：采用 FBIS 量表对120名进食障碍患者家属进行测量和分析,用内在一致性检验、重测信度、评定者信度、内容效度、平行效度、经验效度等指标对 FBIS 量表进行信度和效度的评定。结果：FBIS 量表具有良好的内在一致性,其 Cronbach's 系数α=0.8682；Spearman-Brown 奇偶分半系数 R=0.7181；重测信度较好,两次测量各维度的 Pearson 相关系数为0.807~0.955(P<0.01),总量表为0.949(P<0.01)；4名评定员之间的评定结果有较好的相关性,总量表组内相关系数 ICC =0.9558,各维度为0.5769~0.9794；FBIS 总分与健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)总分呈负相关(Pearson 相关系数=-3.00,P<0.05)、内容效度检验具有统计学意义。结论：FBIS 量表具有较好的信度和效度,可以作为衡量进食障碍家庭负担的评价工具。
目的：：探討傢庭負擔會談量錶(FBIS)在進食障礙患者的傢庭負擔評價中的信度和效度。方法：採用 FBIS 量錶對120名進食障礙患者傢屬進行測量和分析,用內在一緻性檢驗、重測信度、評定者信度、內容效度、平行效度、經驗效度等指標對 FBIS 量錶進行信度和效度的評定。結果：FBIS 量錶具有良好的內在一緻性,其 Cronbach's 繫數α=0.8682；Spearman-Brown 奇偶分半繫數 R=0.7181；重測信度較好,兩次測量各維度的 Pearson 相關繫數為0.807~0.955(P<0.01),總量錶為0.949(P<0.01)；4名評定員之間的評定結果有較好的相關性,總量錶組內相關繫數 ICC =0.9558,各維度為0.5769~0.9794；FBIS 總分與健康狀況調查問捲(SF-36)總分呈負相關(Pearson 相關繫數=-3.00,P<0.05)、內容效度檢驗具有統計學意義。結論：FBIS 量錶具有較好的信度和效度,可以作為衡量進食障礙傢庭負擔的評價工具。
목적：：탐토가정부담회담량표(FBIS)재진식장애환자적가정부담평개중적신도화효도。방법：채용 FBIS 량표대120명진식장애환자가속진행측량화분석,용내재일치성검험、중측신도、평정자신도、내용효도、평행효도、경험효도등지표대 FBIS 량표진행신도화효도적평정。결과：FBIS 량표구유량호적내재일치성,기 Cronbach's 계수α=0.8682；Spearman-Brown 기우분반계수 R=0.7181；중측신도교호,량차측량각유도적 Pearson 상관계수위0.807~0.955(P<0.01),총량표위0.949(P<0.01)；4명평정원지간적평정결과유교호적상관성,총량표조내상관계수 ICC =0.9558,각유도위0.5769~0.9794；FBIS 총분여건강상황조사문권(SF-36)총분정부상관(Pearson 상관계수=-3.00,P<0.05)、내용효도검험구유통계학의의。결론：FBIS 량표구유교호적신도화효도,가이작위형량진식장애가정부담적평개공구。
Objective: To study validity and reliability of family burden interview schedule (FBIS) of patients with eating dis-order. Methods: 120 patients with eating disorder were measured and analyzed with FBIS. The reliability and validity of FBIS were e-valuated by internal consistency test, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, content validity, parallel validity, experience validi-ty and the like. Results: The internal consistency of FBIS was very satisfactory, the value of Cronbach's α was 0. 8682 and the Spearman-Brown split-half coefficient was 0. 7181. The test-retest reliability coefficients for the FBIS were 0. 949 for the overall scale (P<0. 01) and 0. 807 to 0. 955 for the six domains (P<0. 01). The intraclass correlation coefficients of four inter-rater were 0. 9558 for the total scores (P<0. 01) and 0. 5769 to 0. 9794 for the six domains (P<0. 01). The relation between the FBIS and the SF-36 was examined using the Pearson correlation test. The total score for the FBIS was negatively correlated with SF-36 (Pearson correlation coefficient was -3. 00, P<0. 05). The content validity test was statistically significant. Conclusions: The validity and reliability of the family burden interview schedule are satisfied for evaluating family burden of the patients with eating disorder. It can be used in evalua-ting family burden of the patients with eating disorder.
