肿瘤预防与治疗
腫瘤預防與治療
종류예방여치료
JOURNAL OF CANCER CONTROL AND TREATMENT
2014年
6期
276-279
,共4页
肺癌%化疗%生活质量%全程护理
肺癌%化療%生活質量%全程護理
폐암%화료%생활질량%전정호리
Lung Cancer%Chemotherapy%Quality of Life%Whole Course Nursing
目的::探讨全程护理干预对肺癌化疗患者生活质量的影响。方法:将76例接受含铂双药联合化疗方案的肺癌患者随机分为对照组(n=38)和观察组(n=38)。对照组采用化疗常规护理,观察组采用常规护理及全程护理干预。两组患者在治疗前和治疗后采用欧洲癌症化疗患者生活质量量表进行问卷调查。评估全程护理干预对肺癌化疗患者生活质量的影响。结果:两组患者化疗后功能子量表和总体生活质量评分较化疗前均降低。但观察组较对照组降幅小,两组评分变化比较具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者化疗后症状子量表及反映症状和经济状况的特异性项目评分较化疗前均有升高,除呼吸困难、便秘症状和经济状况外,其他项目评分观察组升高值小于对照组,两组评分变化比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对肺癌化疗患者实施全程护理干预,能有效改善化疗后生活质量,减轻化疗相关症状,值得临床推广。
目的::探討全程護理榦預對肺癌化療患者生活質量的影響。方法:將76例接受含鉑雙藥聯閤化療方案的肺癌患者隨機分為對照組(n=38)和觀察組(n=38)。對照組採用化療常規護理,觀察組採用常規護理及全程護理榦預。兩組患者在治療前和治療後採用歐洲癌癥化療患者生活質量量錶進行問捲調查。評估全程護理榦預對肺癌化療患者生活質量的影響。結果:兩組患者化療後功能子量錶和總體生活質量評分較化療前均降低。但觀察組較對照組降幅小,兩組評分變化比較具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。兩組患者化療後癥狀子量錶及反映癥狀和經濟狀況的特異性項目評分較化療前均有升高,除呼吸睏難、便祕癥狀和經濟狀況外,其他項目評分觀察組升高值小于對照組,兩組評分變化比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論:對肺癌化療患者實施全程護理榦預,能有效改善化療後生活質量,減輕化療相關癥狀,值得臨床推廣。
목적::탐토전정호리간예대폐암화료환자생활질량적영향。방법:장76례접수함박쌍약연합화료방안적폐암환자수궤분위대조조(n=38)화관찰조(n=38)。대조조채용화료상규호리,관찰조채용상규호리급전정호리간예。량조환자재치료전화치료후채용구주암증화료환자생활질량량표진행문권조사。평고전정호리간예대폐암화료환자생활질량적영향。결과:량조환자화료후공능자량표화총체생활질량평분교화료전균강저。단관찰조교대조조강폭소,량조평분변화비교구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。량조환자화료후증상자량표급반영증상화경제상황적특이성항목평분교화료전균유승고,제호흡곤난、편비증상화경제상황외,기타항목평분관찰조승고치소우대조조,량조평분변화비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론:대폐암화료환자실시전정호리간예,능유효개선화료후생활질량,감경화료상관증상,치득림상추엄。
Objective: To explore the effect of the whole course nursing intervention on the life quality of patients with lung cancer who were treated with chemotherapy. Methods:Seventy-six lung cancer patients who received chemother-apy during hospitalization from March 2010 to March 2011 were randomly divided into two groups:control group (n=38) and observer group (n=38). Common chemotherapy nursing was conducted in the control group , while the whole course nursing intervention was carried out in observer group besides the common chemotherapy nursing . QLQ-30 of EORTC was applied to assess the effect of the whole course nursing intervention on the life quality of patients before and after treatment. Results:The scores of the overall life quality and functional scales declined after chemotherapy in both groups, while they declined less obviously in observer group than those in control group (P<0. 05). The scores of symptom scales and specif-ic items which reflected the status of symptom and financial situation increased after chemotherapy in both groups. Among which , scores of fatigue, nausea, vomiting , pain , sleep disorder, loss of appetite , and diarrhea increased less obviouse-ly in observer group than those in control group (P<0. 05). Conclusion: The whole course nursing intervention on lung cancer patients can improve their life quality after chemotherapy, as well as alleviate the side effects related to chemothera-py and it is worthy of clinical application.