CAJ | 학술논문

本文对周雪光、张静、曹正汉和冯仕政四位教授的评论文章进行了回应。笔者的回应侧重在各位评论人提出的带有批判性质的意见和建议上。笔者和评论人的分歧主要集中在行政发包制的界定、内涵和形成原因、统治风险的内涵和影响、发包人和承包人的权力配置等问题上，对于这些问题，笔者试图做进一步的澄清和解释。鉴于评论人的批评建议，本文也讨论了行政发包制未来可以进一步扩展和完善的领域。最后，笔者提出了一个好的理论的三个标准，并讨论了跨学科交流对于发展好理论的重要意义。
본문대주설광、장정、조정한화풍사정사위교수적평논문장진행료회응。필자적회응측중재각위평론인제출적대유비판성질적의견화건의상。필자화평론인적분기주요집중재행정발포제적계정、내함화형성원인、통치풍험적내함화영향、발포인화승포인적권력배치등문제상，대우저사문제，필자시도주진일보적징청화해석。감우평론인적비평건의，본문야토론료행정발포제미래가이진일보확전화완선적영역。최후，필자제출료일개호적이론적삼개표준，병토론료과학과교류대우발전호이론적중요의의。
This piece serves as a response to the comments on my paper“Administrative Subcontract” made by Zhou Xueguang ,Zhang Jing ,Cao Zhenghan ,and Feng Shizheng .My reply focuses both on their critical comments and suggestions . Our differences center on such issues as the definition , content ,and causes of administrative subcontract system ,the definition and implications of ruling risks ,and authority allocation between the principal and the agent .In the reply I try to clarify the confusions and explain the reasons why we differ in these matters and indicate my stance . Following the commentators’ critical comments and suggestions ,I also discuss the possibilities and directions for further improvement of the administrative subcontract theory . In the conclusion ,I propose three criteria for a good theory and highlight the importance of interdisciplinary academic exchange and interaction in developing a good theory .