CAJ | 학술논문

对诉讼和解性质定位，理论上可用“私法行为说”为基点来加以说明，当事人可在和解协议中约定具有诉讼效力，由于和解协议的达成发生在诉讼过程中，和解协议是经过法院审查确认的，此时便具有了诉讼效力正当性基础。和解协议具有诉讼效力，也保证了诉讼和解的强制性和权威性。遵循对诉讼和解的实质化、要件化、具体化这一发展路径，并对今后可能的发展方向进行讨论，从诉讼和解制度的具体建构中明确其在司法实务中的功能和价值。
대소송화해성질정위，이론상가용“사법행위설”위기점래가이설명，당사인가재화해협의중약정구유소송효력，유우화해협의적체성발생재소송과정중，화해협의시경과법원심사학인적，차시편구유료소송효력정당성기출。화해협의구유소송효력，야보증료소송화해적강제성화권위성。준순대소송화해적실질화、요건화、구체화저일발전로경，병대금후가능적발전방향진행토론，종소송화해제도적구체건구중명학기재사법실무중적공능화개치。
Based on the theory of“private law behavior”,we can define and explain the nature of settlement of action. And each of the parties can reach an agreement to maKe the settlement valid. For the settlement agreement is reached in the process of litigation,and examined and affirmed by the court,it has litigation efficiency. Because of the legal effectiveness of the agreement,the mandatory and authority of reconciliation in an action can be ensured. We should abide by the essence,require-ments,and specific of reconciliation in an action,discuss the possible development direction for the future,and clarify its function and value in the judicial practice from the construction of lawsuit re-conciliation system.