华西口腔医学杂志
華西口腔醫學雜誌
화서구강의학잡지
WEST CHINA JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
2014年
6期
556-560
,共5页
田艾%梁星%廖健%孙旭%滕敏华%张利%陈悦
田艾%樑星%廖健%孫旭%滕敏華%張利%陳悅
전애%량성%료건%손욱%등민화%장리%진열
硅橡胶%赝复体%生物安全性
硅橡膠%贗複體%生物安全性
규상효%안복체%생물안전성
silicone rubber%prosthesis%biological safety
目的:??初步评价球囊式中空赝复体用硅橡胶(SRISP)的生物安全性,为后期临床应用提供依据。方法??参照国家标准GB/T?16886.10—2005、YY/T?0127.13—2009和GB/T?16886.11—2011规定的方法,采用最大剂量致敏试验、口腔黏膜刺激试验以及短期全身毒性试验(经口途径)评价SRISP的体内生物安全性。结果??最大剂量致敏试验:豚鼠腹部移去敷贴24、48、72?h后,无红斑、水肿,致敏率为0,SRISP无潜在致敏性;口腔黏膜刺激试验:金黄地鼠缝合部位黏膜未见出血、肿胀,组织学观察未出现病理性改变,SRISP无口腔黏膜刺激性;短期全身毒性试验:大鼠未见临床毒性体征,体重稳定增长,灌胃前后实验组和对照组大鼠体重与体重相对增长率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),SRISP无短期全身毒性。结论??经动物实验表明SRISP具有良好的体内生物安全性,有望用于制作赝复体以修复颌骨缺损。
目的:??初步評價毬囊式中空贗複體用硅橡膠(SRISP)的生物安全性,為後期臨床應用提供依據。方法??參照國傢標準GB/T?16886.10—2005、YY/T?0127.13—2009和GB/T?16886.11—2011規定的方法,採用最大劑量緻敏試驗、口腔黏膜刺激試驗以及短期全身毒性試驗(經口途徑)評價SRISP的體內生物安全性。結果??最大劑量緻敏試驗:豚鼠腹部移去敷貼24、48、72?h後,無紅斑、水腫,緻敏率為0,SRISP無潛在緻敏性;口腔黏膜刺激試驗:金黃地鼠縫閤部位黏膜未見齣血、腫脹,組織學觀察未齣現病理性改變,SRISP無口腔黏膜刺激性;短期全身毒性試驗:大鼠未見臨床毒性體徵,體重穩定增長,灌胃前後實驗組和對照組大鼠體重與體重相對增長率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),SRISP無短期全身毒性。結論??經動物實驗錶明SRISP具有良好的體內生物安全性,有望用于製作贗複體以脩複頜骨缺損。
목적:??초보평개구낭식중공안복체용규상효(SRISP)적생물안전성,위후기림상응용제공의거。방법??삼조국가표준GB/T?16886.10—2005、YY/T?0127.13—2009화GB/T?16886.11—2011규정적방법,채용최대제량치민시험、구강점막자격시험이급단기전신독성시험(경구도경)평개SRISP적체내생물안전성。결과??최대제량치민시험:돈서복부이거부첩24、48、72?h후,무홍반、수종,치민솔위0,SRISP무잠재치민성;구강점막자격시험:금황지서봉합부위점막미견출혈、종창,조직학관찰미출현병이성개변,SRISP무구강점막자격성;단기전신독성시험:대서미견림상독성체정,체중은정증장,관위전후실험조화대조조대서체중여체중상대증장솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),SRISP무단기전신독성。결론??경동물실험표명SRISP구유량호적체내생물안전성,유망용우제작안복체이수복합골결손。
Objective ??The?biological?safety?of?a?new?developed?silicone?rubber?for?inflatable?silastic?prosthesis?(SRISP)?was?evaluated. Methods ??Following?the?GB/T?16886.10-2005?standard,?YY/T?0127.13-2009?standard,?and?GB/T?16886.11-2011?standard,?samples?were?prepared?and?tested?by?animal?experiments,?such?as?guinea?pig?maximization?test,?oral?mucous?membrane?irritation?test,?and?short-term?systemic?toxicity?test?(oral?route).?Results ??No?obvious?erythema?and?edema?in?the?guinea?pig?abdominal?skin?were?observed?after?24,?48,?and?72?h?of?stimulating?touch,?thus?indicating?that?SRISP?does?not?cause?potential?skin?sensitivity.?No?local?response?to?SRISP?was?found,?and?the?visual?observation?and?pathological?findings?of?oral?mucosa?were?normal?and?similar?to?that?of?the?control?group.?Therefore,?SRISP?had?no?irritation?response?to?oral?mucosa.?No?clinical?signs?of?toxicity?were?observed?in?rats,?and?no?significant?differences?in?weight?and?weight?relative?growth?rate?between?extract?group?and?blank?control?group?(P>0.05)?were?found.?Thus,?SRISP?had?no?short-term?systemic?toxicity.?Conclusion ??These?results?indicated?that?SRISP?met?the?requirement?of?biomedical?materials?and?had?good?bio-security.