解放军护理杂志
解放軍護理雜誌
해방군호리잡지
NURSING JOURNAL OF CHINESE PEOPLE'S LIBERATION ARMY
2014年
24期
10-12,16
,共4页
减压床垫%压疮%预防%神经内科%卧床患者
減壓床墊%壓瘡%預防%神經內科%臥床患者
감압상점%압창%예방%신경내과%와상환자
stress reduce mattress%pressure ulcer%prevention%department of neurology%bedridden patient
目的：比较静态空气床垫与动态空气床垫对预防神经内科卧床患者压疮发生的效果.方法便利选取2012年5－8月南京军区南京总医院的神经内科患者90例,根据随机数字表法分为静态空气床垫组和动态空气床垫组各45例,两组均每2 h翻身1次,预期观察14 d,比较两组患者的压疮发生率、压疮严重度、Braden压疮危险评估结果及成本效益.结果两组患者观察期内压疮发生率均为0；Braden压疮危险评估结果分别为(14．45±2．07)分和(14．25±2．49)分,差异无统计学意义(P＞0．05)；静态空气床垫价格比动态空气床垫价格低350元,且无医疗耗电；静态空气床垫和动态空气床垫的平均护理时间分别为(8．87±3．03)、(9．00±3．10)d,平均每人翻身次数分别为(108±37．16)、(106±36．33)次,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0．05).结论静态空气床垫与动态空气床垫比较,其预防压疮的效果相当,但成本投入少于动态空气床垫.
目的：比較靜態空氣床墊與動態空氣床墊對預防神經內科臥床患者壓瘡髮生的效果.方法便利選取2012年5－8月南京軍區南京總醫院的神經內科患者90例,根據隨機數字錶法分為靜態空氣床墊組和動態空氣床墊組各45例,兩組均每2 h翻身1次,預期觀察14 d,比較兩組患者的壓瘡髮生率、壓瘡嚴重度、Braden壓瘡危險評估結果及成本效益.結果兩組患者觀察期內壓瘡髮生率均為0；Braden壓瘡危險評估結果分彆為(14．45±2．07)分和(14．25±2．49)分,差異無統計學意義(P＞0．05)；靜態空氣床墊價格比動態空氣床墊價格低350元,且無醫療耗電；靜態空氣床墊和動態空氣床墊的平均護理時間分彆為(8．87±3．03)、(9．00±3．10)d,平均每人翻身次數分彆為(108±37．16)、(106±36．33)次,差異均無統計學意義(P＞0．05).結論靜態空氣床墊與動態空氣床墊比較,其預防壓瘡的效果相噹,但成本投入少于動態空氣床墊.
목적：비교정태공기상점여동태공기상점대예방신경내과와상환자압창발생적효과.방법편리선취2012년5－8월남경군구남경총의원적신경내과환자90례,근거수궤수자표법분위정태공기상점조화동태공기상점조각45례,량조균매2 h번신1차,예기관찰14 d,비교량조환자적압창발생솔、압창엄중도、Braden압창위험평고결과급성본효익.결과량조환자관찰기내압창발생솔균위0；Braden압창위험평고결과분별위(14．45±2．07)분화(14．25±2．49)분,차이무통계학의의(P＞0．05)；정태공기상점개격비동태공기상점개격저350원,차무의료모전；정태공기상점화동태공기상점적평균호리시간분별위(8．87±3．03)、(9．00±3．10)d,평균매인번신차수분별위(108±37．16)、(106±36．33)차,차이균무통계학의의(P＞0．05).결론정태공기상점여동태공기상점비교,기예방압창적효과상당,단성본투입소우동태공기상점.
Objective To explore the effect of static air mattress and dynamic air mattress support in pre-venting pressure ulcers in patients of neurology department.Methods By convenience sampling,90 patients of neurology department were selected and equally divided into static air mattress group and dynamic air mattress group,Two groups of patients were all had every 2 h repositing and the expected observation period of 14 days.The incidence of pressure ulcer and the severity of pressure ulcer,Braden risk assessment result and the cost-benefit were compared.Results The incidence of pressure ulcers were 0 in both groups.The Braden scoring results were the (14.45±2.07)and (14.25±2.49)respectively(P>0.05).The result of cost-benefit analysis showed that price of static air mattress was less 350RMB than dynamic air mattress support without medical power assumption.The average nursing time of two groups patients was (8.87±3.03)days and (9±3.10) days respectively,and the average roll over times were (108±37.16)and (106±36.33)times with no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion Static air mattress and dynamic air mattress support both have the effect of preventing pressure ulcers,while the expense are less in dynamic air mattress.
