皖南医学院学报
皖南醫學院學報
환남의학원학보
ACTA ACADEMIAE MEDICINAE WANNAN
2014年
6期
555-558
,共4页
王丽%颜方%刘园园%林光永%马从学
王麗%顏方%劉園園%林光永%馬從學
왕려%안방%류완완%림광영%마종학
术前心理干预%未产妇%无痛人工流产%丙泊酚%芬太尼
術前心理榦預%未產婦%無痛人工流產%丙泊酚%芬太尼
술전심리간예%미산부%무통인공유산%병박분%분태니
preoperative psychological intervention%nulliparous women%painless artificial abortion%propofol%fentanyl
目的:探讨术前心理干预对未产妇无痛人工流产术的临床疗效。方法:选取60例拟进行无痛人工流产术的未产妇,随机分为对照组和干预组,每组30例。对照组采用丙泊酚联合芬太尼静脉麻醉,干预组采用术前心理干预后,行丙泊酚联合芬太尼静脉麻醉。评价患者手术前后焦虑自评量表( SAS)评分、麻醉效果、面部表情疼痛量表( FPS-R)评分、丙泊酚用量和手术时间的变化情况。结果:干预组经心理干预后,SAS评分较干预前明显降低( P<0.01)。两组手术前后SAS评分差值比较,差异显著( P<0.01),与对照组相比,干预组麻醉效果较好,差异显著( P<0.05),麻醉效果达优率相对升高(86.7% vs 56.7%),FPS-R评分显著降低( P<0.05),丙泊酚用量也明显减少( P<0.05),但手术时间并无明显差异( P>0.05)。结论:术前心理干预不但能减轻患者焦虑情绪,而且在改善麻醉、镇痛效果等方面具有一定的积极作用。
目的:探討術前心理榦預對未產婦無痛人工流產術的臨床療效。方法:選取60例擬進行無痛人工流產術的未產婦,隨機分為對照組和榦預組,每組30例。對照組採用丙泊酚聯閤芬太尼靜脈痳醉,榦預組採用術前心理榦預後,行丙泊酚聯閤芬太尼靜脈痳醉。評價患者手術前後焦慮自評量錶( SAS)評分、痳醉效果、麵部錶情疼痛量錶( FPS-R)評分、丙泊酚用量和手術時間的變化情況。結果:榦預組經心理榦預後,SAS評分較榦預前明顯降低( P<0.01)。兩組手術前後SAS評分差值比較,差異顯著( P<0.01),與對照組相比,榦預組痳醉效果較好,差異顯著( P<0.05),痳醉效果達優率相對升高(86.7% vs 56.7%),FPS-R評分顯著降低( P<0.05),丙泊酚用量也明顯減少( P<0.05),但手術時間併無明顯差異( P>0.05)。結論:術前心理榦預不但能減輕患者焦慮情緒,而且在改善痳醉、鎮痛效果等方麵具有一定的積極作用。
목적:탐토술전심리간예대미산부무통인공유산술적림상료효。방법:선취60례의진행무통인공유산술적미산부,수궤분위대조조화간예조,매조30례。대조조채용병박분연합분태니정맥마취,간예조채용술전심리간예후,행병박분연합분태니정맥마취。평개환자수술전후초필자평량표( SAS)평분、마취효과、면부표정동통량표( FPS-R)평분、병박분용량화수술시간적변화정황。결과:간예조경심리간예후,SAS평분교간예전명현강저( P<0.01)。량조수술전후SAS평분차치비교,차이현저( P<0.01),여대조조상비,간예조마취효과교호,차이현저( P<0.05),마취효과체우솔상대승고(86.7% vs 56.7%),FPS-R평분현저강저( P<0.05),병박분용량야명현감소( P<0.05),단수술시간병무명현차이( P>0.05)。결론:술전심리간예불단능감경환자초필정서,이차재개선마취、진통효과등방면구유일정적적겁작용。
Objective:To investigate the clinical effects of preoperative psychological intervention on nulliparous women undergoing painless artificial abor-tion.Methods:Sixty young nulliparous women undergoing planned painless artificial abortion were randomly allocated to control group (n=30) and inter-vention group (n=30).The control group received intravenous anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl,and the intervention group were given combined in-travenous analgesics of propofol and fentanyl with additional preoperative psychological intervention .Two groups were examined concerning the preoperative scoring on Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS),analgesic effect,intraoperative scores on Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R),dosage of propofol and operative time.Results:SAS scoring in the intervention group was significantly lower than that before psychological intervention (P <0.01),and two groups were significantly different regarding SAS scores before operation(P<0.01).Compared to the control group,intervention group achieved better analgesic effects (86.7% vs.56.7%),with lower FPS-R scoring and reduced dosage of propofol(P <0.05),yet the operative time was not significant(P >0.05). Conclusion:Preoperative psychological intervention may not only relieve the anxiety but improve the analgesic effect on nulliparous women undergoing painless artificial abortion.