CAJ | 학술논문

在现行刑事司法环境下，保障人权的呼声高涨，重大疑难犯罪频发，证据收集和采信的标准日益严格，刑事犯罪治理面临前所未有的挑战，提前介入作为检察引导和监督侦查的工作机制迎来了制度适用的好时机。然而提前介入机制却因立法规制过于原则化、实践配套性规范的缺失和地方化司法实践需要的绑架难以发挥预期的立法规制价值，陷入制度践行不畅的难产局面，从而面临机制的使命认知迷茫、介入必要性争议不断、介入适度性标准不一这三大困境。
재현행형사사법배경하，보장인권적호성고창，중대의난범죄빈발，증거수집화채신적표준일익엄격，형사범죄치리면림전소미유적도전，제전개입작위검찰인도화감독정사적공작궤제영래료제도괄용적호시궤。연이제전개입궤제각인입법규제과우원칙화、실천배투성규범적결실화지방화사법실천수요적방가난이발휘예기적입법규제개치，함입제도천행불창적난산국면，종이면림궤제적사명인지미망、개입필요성쟁의불단、개입괄도성표준불일저삼대곤경。
With the rising voices of human rights protection, frequent occurrence of major complex crime, and the collection and adoption of evidence becoming stricter, criminal governance is facing unprecedented challenges. As a working mechanism of guiding and supervising the prosecutorial investigation, prior intervention by procurator gains a good opportunity under the current criminal judicial condition. However, owing to ambiguous legislation, lack of operational speciifcation and different local justice needs, it was caught in inhibited position and had to face three problems which are confused mission, controversy over necessity and disagreement on the intervention degree.