CAJ | 학술논문

王友敏先生《<资治通鉴>标点纠谬》提出，《北史》《北齐书》及《资治通鉴》中的“薛孤康买”应断为“薛孤康、买”，指“薛孤康、薛孤买”二人；“薛孤延康买”应为“薛孤延、康、买”，指“薛孤延、薛孤康、薛孤买”三人。王先生的主要依据是《元和姓纂》的一则史料，因其论证欠严密，且以其结论比照于历史情境也存在诸多不合，故其结论恐难成立。按当时的出使惯例，“薛孤康买”作为使主，只能是姓薛孤名康买之一人，《资治通鉴》对此已有鉴别与修正之功；“薛孤延康买”当为二人，但究竟是“薛孤延、康买”还是“薛孤延、薛孤康买”尚难确论。
왕우민선생《<자치통감>표점규류》제출，《북사》《북제서》급《자치통감》중적“설고강매”응단위“설고강、매”，지“설고강、설고매”이인；“설고연강매”응위“설고연、강、매”，지“설고연、설고강、설고매”삼인。왕선생적주요의거시《원화성찬》적일칙사료，인기론증흠엄밀，차이기결론비조우역사정경야존재제다불합，고기결론공난성립。안당시적출사관례，“설고강매”작위사주，지능시성설고명강매지일인，《자치통감》대차이유감별여수정지공；“설고연강매”당위이인，단구경시“설고연、강매”환시“설고연、설고강매”상난학론。
Mr.Wang Youmin proposed a new viewpoint according to the historical materials in Yuanhexing-zuan(《元和姓纂》) mainly in his paper Correction of Punctuations in Comprehensive Mirror for Aid in Government. He thought that“Xuegukangmai” in Beishi, Beiqishu and Comprehensive Mirror for Aid in Government referred to“Xuegu Kang” and“Xuegu Mai” and that“Xueguyankangmai” referred to “XueguYan, Xuegu Kang and Xuegu Mai”.In my opinion, Mr Wang’ argument is not rigorous, which does not conform to the historical situation.Ac-cording to the usual practice in sending envoys, “Xuegukangmai” should be one person whose name is “Xuegu Kangmai” as ambassador.Comprehensive Mirror for Aid in Government differentiated and corrected this, which we should pay attention to.According to the historical records,“Xueguyankangmai” should refer to two persons.But we cannot be sure whether it refers to“ Xue Guyan and Kangmai” or“Xue Guyan and Xuegu Kangmai”.