肿瘤影像学
腫瘤影像學
종류영상학
Oncoradiology
2014年
4期
266-271
,共6页
王之龙%魏伟%曹喜生%陈英%陈韵彬
王之龍%魏偉%曹喜生%陳英%陳韻彬
왕지룡%위위%조희생%진영%진운빈
胃癌%容积CT%分期
胃癌%容積CT%分期
위암%용적CT%분기
Gastric cancer%Volumetric computed tomography%Staging
目的:分析容积CT在胃癌初诊患者治疗前TN临床分期中的诊断价值。方法连续收集胃癌初诊患者共109例,所有患者术前接受容积CT对比剂增强扫描,并行根治性手术及病理学检查获得病理TN分期。由影像科医师观察胃癌在多平面CT图像上的影像表现判断临床T分期。用CT轴位图像测量区域淋巴结,分别以短径≥5、8及11 mm作为阈值判断转移并获得临床N分期,与术后病理分期对照,计算CT诊断胃癌治疗前TN分期的准确率。结果容积CT诊断胃癌T分期的准确率为86.2%,诊断早期胃癌及进展期胃癌T分期的准确率分别为80.0%和87.2%。以淋巴结短径≥5、8及11 mm作为阈值诊断转移时,判断患者存在淋巴结转移(即区分N0与N+)的准确率分别为79.8%、76.1%及62.4%,诊断N分期的准确率分别为51.4%、47.7%及43.1%。对于早期胃癌,以淋巴结短径≥5、8及11 mm作为阈值诊断N分期的准确率分别为73.3%、93.3%及100.0%;对于进展期胃癌,以淋巴结短径≥5、8及11 mm作为阈值诊断N分期的准确率分别为46.8%、40.4%及34.0%。结论容积CT诊断初诊胃癌治疗前T分期具有较高的准确率。治疗前使用CT诊断胃癌N分期能力不佳,区分N0与N+时以淋巴结短径≥5 mm作为阈值较好,对早期与进展期胃癌应采用不同的阈值判断N分期。
目的:分析容積CT在胃癌初診患者治療前TN臨床分期中的診斷價值。方法連續收集胃癌初診患者共109例,所有患者術前接受容積CT對比劑增彊掃描,併行根治性手術及病理學檢查穫得病理TN分期。由影像科醫師觀察胃癌在多平麵CT圖像上的影像錶現判斷臨床T分期。用CT軸位圖像測量區域淋巴結,分彆以短徑≥5、8及11 mm作為閾值判斷轉移併穫得臨床N分期,與術後病理分期對照,計算CT診斷胃癌治療前TN分期的準確率。結果容積CT診斷胃癌T分期的準確率為86.2%,診斷早期胃癌及進展期胃癌T分期的準確率分彆為80.0%和87.2%。以淋巴結短徑≥5、8及11 mm作為閾值診斷轉移時,判斷患者存在淋巴結轉移(即區分N0與N+)的準確率分彆為79.8%、76.1%及62.4%,診斷N分期的準確率分彆為51.4%、47.7%及43.1%。對于早期胃癌,以淋巴結短徑≥5、8及11 mm作為閾值診斷N分期的準確率分彆為73.3%、93.3%及100.0%;對于進展期胃癌,以淋巴結短徑≥5、8及11 mm作為閾值診斷N分期的準確率分彆為46.8%、40.4%及34.0%。結論容積CT診斷初診胃癌治療前T分期具有較高的準確率。治療前使用CT診斷胃癌N分期能力不佳,區分N0與N+時以淋巴結短徑≥5 mm作為閾值較好,對早期與進展期胃癌應採用不同的閾值判斷N分期。
목적:분석용적CT재위암초진환자치료전TN림상분기중적진단개치。방법련속수집위암초진환자공109례,소유환자술전접수용적CT대비제증강소묘,병행근치성수술급병이학검사획득병리TN분기。유영상과의사관찰위암재다평면CT도상상적영상표현판단림상T분기。용CT축위도상측량구역림파결,분별이단경≥5、8급11 mm작위역치판단전이병획득림상N분기,여술후병리분기대조,계산CT진단위암치료전TN분기적준학솔。결과용적CT진단위암T분기적준학솔위86.2%,진단조기위암급진전기위암T분기적준학솔분별위80.0%화87.2%。이림파결단경≥5、8급11 mm작위역치진단전이시,판단환자존재림파결전이(즉구분N0여N+)적준학솔분별위79.8%、76.1%급62.4%,진단N분기적준학솔분별위51.4%、47.7%급43.1%。대우조기위암,이림파결단경≥5、8급11 mm작위역치진단N분기적준학솔분별위73.3%、93.3%급100.0%;대우진전기위암,이림파결단경≥5、8급11 mm작위역치진단N분기적준학솔분별위46.8%、40.4%급34.0%。결론용적CT진단초진위암치료전T분기구유교고적준학솔。치료전사용CT진단위암N분기능력불가,구분N0여N+시이림파결단경≥5 mm작위역치교호,대조기여진전기위암응채용불동적역치판단N분기。
Objective To explore the diagnostic value of volumetric computed tomography (CT) in the pretreatment TN staging [American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), 7th edition] of gastric cancer.Methods A total of 109 consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent volumetric CT before treatment were included. They all received radical gastrectomy and lymph node dissection. The pTN staging was confirmed by histopathologic results. The radiologists performed the diagnosis of T staging with CT axial and multiplanar reconstruction images. They diagnosed metastatic lymph nodes with the short-diameter larger than or equal to 5 mm, 8 mm or 11 mm, respectively. Then they defined cN staging by the number of metastatic lymph nodes. Contrasted to the pathological TN staging, the accuracy of cTN staging by radiologist was calculated with statistical software. Results The accuracy of T staging with volumetric CT imaging for gastric cancer was 86.2%. The diagnostic accuracy of T staging for early and advanced gastric cancers was 80.0% and 87.2%, respectively. Using the short-diameter of node larger than or equal to 5 mm, 8 mm or 11 mm as diagnostic threshold, the accuracy was 79.8%, 76.1% and 62.4%, respectively. And the cN staging accuracy was 51.4%, 47.7% and 43.1%, respectively. For early gastric cancer, the cN staging accuracy was 73.3%, 93.3% and 100.0%, respectively. For advanced gastric cancer, the cN staging accuracy was 46.8%, 40.4% and 34.0%, respectively.Conclusion Volumetric CT had satisfying diagnostic value in the pretreatment TN staging of gastric cancer. But the cN staging accuracy was not satisfying. For distinguishing the patients with positive nodes or not, short-diameter of 5 mm as the threshold could perform better. It is suggested that different diagnostic thresholds for lymph node metastases in early and advanced gastric cancers should be used.