中国烟草科学
中國煙草科學
중국연초과학
CHINESE TOBACCO SCIENCE
2014年
6期
32-37
,共6页
刘燕%赵正雄%付修廷%展恩能%蒋跃%黄韡%陈晓燕%李崇禄%赵芳%余海涛
劉燕%趙正雄%付脩廷%展恩能%蔣躍%黃韡%陳曉燕%李崇祿%趙芳%餘海濤
류연%조정웅%부수정%전은능%장약%황위%진효연%리숭록%조방%여해도
烤烟%施肥%优化%产量%质量
烤煙%施肥%優化%產量%質量
고연%시비%우화%산량%질량
flue-cured tobacco%fertilization%optimization%yield%quality
针对昭通当地烟叶质量难以满足卷烟企业对原烟品质的更高要求,2010—2011年研究了在常规施肥基础上进行的施肥方法调整和养分配比调整对烟株生长及品质的影响。结果表明:(1)综合2年农艺性状结果,以施肥方法调整相对更好;2010年病虫害总体以2个施肥调整处理抗性更好;(2)较常规相比,2个施肥调整能不同程度的增产、增值,以养分配比调整效果更好;(3)烤后叶长、叶宽和单叶重差异不大,含梗率和叶面密度总体以养分配比调整相对更好;(4)2个施肥调整处理初烤烟叶的总糖、还原糖含量较常规高,3个处理其他化学成分含量较接近;(5)与常规相比,施肥方法调整和养分配比调整评吸总分分别增加了4.1和3.0分,质量均提高了2个档次。综上所述,当地现有施肥模式尚有调整优化空间,2个施肥调整均有明显的提质增产效果,以养分配比调整效果更为显著。
針對昭通噹地煙葉質量難以滿足捲煙企業對原煙品質的更高要求,2010—2011年研究瞭在常規施肥基礎上進行的施肥方法調整和養分配比調整對煙株生長及品質的影響。結果錶明:(1)綜閤2年農藝性狀結果,以施肥方法調整相對更好;2010年病蟲害總體以2箇施肥調整處理抗性更好;(2)較常規相比,2箇施肥調整能不同程度的增產、增值,以養分配比調整效果更好;(3)烤後葉長、葉寬和單葉重差異不大,含梗率和葉麵密度總體以養分配比調整相對更好;(4)2箇施肥調整處理初烤煙葉的總糖、還原糖含量較常規高,3箇處理其他化學成分含量較接近;(5)與常規相比,施肥方法調整和養分配比調整評吸總分分彆增加瞭4.1和3.0分,質量均提高瞭2箇檔次。綜上所述,噹地現有施肥模式尚有調整優化空間,2箇施肥調整均有明顯的提質增產效果,以養分配比調整效果更為顯著。
침대소통당지연협질량난이만족권연기업대원연품질적경고요구,2010—2011년연구료재상규시비기출상진행적시비방법조정화양분배비조정대연주생장급품질적영향。결과표명:(1)종합2년농예성상결과,이시비방법조정상대경호;2010년병충해총체이2개시비조정처리항성경호;(2)교상규상비,2개시비조정능불동정도적증산、증치,이양분배비조정효과경호;(3)고후협장、협관화단협중차이불대,함경솔화협면밀도총체이양분배비조정상대경호;(4)2개시비조정처리초고연협적총당、환원당함량교상규고,3개처리기타화학성분함량교접근;(5)여상규상비,시비방법조정화양분배비조정평흡총분분별증가료4.1화3.0분,질량균제고료2개당차。종상소술,당지현유시비모식상유조정우화공간,2개시비조정균유명현적제질증산효과,이양분배비조정효과경위현저。
Because tobacco leaf quality in Zhaotong could not meet the higher requirements of cigarette enterprises for raw tobacco quality, Field experiment were conducted to study the effect of adjusting fertilization on the tobacco growth and leaf quality from 2010 to 2011, including local conventional fertilization, adjusting the fertilizing method and adjusting the nutrients ratio. The results showed that, adjusting fertilizer method was the best in term of the agronomic attributes for the two years. Adjusting fertilizer method and adjusting nutrients ratio treatments improved disease resistance in 2010. Compared with conventional fertilizer application, adjusting fertilizer treatment increased yield and economic value in different levels, and the effect of adjusting nutrients ratio was better. There were little difference among leaf length, leaf width and leaf weight among treatments. Percentage of stem and leaf density of adjusting nutrients ratio was relatively better than others. Total sugar and reducing sugar for adjusting fertilizer treatment were higher than conventional fertilization. The two total scores for adjusting fertilizer method and adjusting nutrients ratio treatments increased by 4.1 and 3 points, respectively, and the quality improved by 2 grades. In conclusion, adjusting fertilizer method and adjusting nutrients ratio treatment can improve quality and increase yield, but the later treatment was more effectively.