CAJ | 학술논문

DB模式和EPC模式均属于设计与施工一体化的组织管理模式，但两者存在明显的差异。现有研究主要比较了合同内容方面的差异性，没有从管理体制这一根本层次上分析两者的差别。在着重分析两种模式管理体制的基础上，详细对比了合同内容上的区别，分别从承包范围、设计工作内容、风险分担、索赔范围、适用范围等方面，提出了DB模式和EPC模式之间的主要差异。对比分析结果对进一步研究DB、EPC模式的相关问题具有理论参考价值，同时对工程管理实践具有指导意义。
DB모식화EPC모식균속우설계여시공일체화적조직관리모식，단량자존재명현적차이。현유연구주요비교료합동내용방면적차이성，몰유종관리체제저일근본층차상분석량자적차별。재착중분석량충모식관리체제적기출상，상세대비료합동내용상적구별，분별종승포범위、설계공작내용、풍험분담、색배범위、괄용범위등방면，제출료DB모식화EPC모식지간적주요차이。대비분석결과대진일보연구DB、EPC모식적상관문제구유이론삼고개치，동시대공정관리실천구유지도의의。
DB and EPC are both management mode of design and construction organization integration,but there are obvious differences between the two. Former studies compare the differences in contract terms,but do not analyze the differences between the management system from the fundamental level. This paper analyzes the management system of the two modes. And on such basis,a detailed comparison of the differences in contract scope,design,risk sharing,claims scope,and application scope between DB and EPC is conducted. Comparative analysis results of this study are valuable for further research on DB and EPC,and are of guiding significance for project management practices.