现代临床护理
現代臨床護理
현대림상호리
MODERN CLINICAL NURSING
2014年
11期
27-30
,共4页
何佩仪%柳建华%刘丽兰%杜萍%卫建宁%罗丽燕
何珮儀%柳建華%劉麗蘭%杜萍%衛建寧%囉麗燕
하패의%류건화%류려란%두평%위건저%라려연
经外周置入中心静脉导管%超声%塞丁格技术
經外週置入中心靜脈導管%超聲%塞丁格技術
경외주치입중심정맥도관%초성%새정격기술
peripherally inserted central catheter%ultrasound%Seldinger technique
目的:探讨超声引导联合塞丁格技术在经外周置入中心静脉导管(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)置管中的应用效果。方法将1008例需行PICC置管的恶性肿瘤患者,根据肘部血管条件,良好者(即直视或可触及有弹性的肘部静脉)作为对照组(540例),差者﹙即直视或触摸不到肘部静脉﹚为实验组(468例)。对照组患者按常规在肘部静脉置入PICC导管,实验组患者通过贵要静脉或肱静脉在超声引导联合塞丁格技术下置入PICC导管。比较两组患者一次穿刺成功率、一次置管成功率及术后机械性静脉炎、静脉血栓、导管相关性感染发生率。结果两组患者一次穿刺成功率比较, P>0.05,差异无统计学意义,但实验组一次性置管成功率明显高于对照组,置管后机械性静脉炎、静脉血栓、导管相关性感染发生率明显低于对照组,两组比较,均P<0.001,差异具有统计学意义。结论超声引导结合赛丁格技术行PICC置管成功率高,术后并发症少,安全性高。
目的:探討超聲引導聯閤塞丁格技術在經外週置入中心靜脈導管(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)置管中的應用效果。方法將1008例需行PICC置管的噁性腫瘤患者,根據肘部血管條件,良好者(即直視或可觸及有彈性的肘部靜脈)作為對照組(540例),差者﹙即直視或觸摸不到肘部靜脈﹚為實驗組(468例)。對照組患者按常規在肘部靜脈置入PICC導管,實驗組患者通過貴要靜脈或肱靜脈在超聲引導聯閤塞丁格技術下置入PICC導管。比較兩組患者一次穿刺成功率、一次置管成功率及術後機械性靜脈炎、靜脈血栓、導管相關性感染髮生率。結果兩組患者一次穿刺成功率比較, P>0.05,差異無統計學意義,但實驗組一次性置管成功率明顯高于對照組,置管後機械性靜脈炎、靜脈血栓、導管相關性感染髮生率明顯低于對照組,兩組比較,均P<0.001,差異具有統計學意義。結論超聲引導結閤賽丁格技術行PICC置管成功率高,術後併髮癥少,安全性高。
목적:탐토초성인도연합새정격기술재경외주치입중심정맥도관(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)치관중적응용효과。방법장1008례수행PICC치관적악성종류환자,근거주부혈관조건,량호자(즉직시혹가촉급유탄성적주부정맥)작위대조조(540례),차자﹙즉직시혹촉모불도주부정맥﹚위실험조(468례)。대조조환자안상규재주부정맥치입PICC도관,실험조환자통과귀요정맥혹굉정맥재초성인도연합새정격기술하치입PICC도관。비교량조환자일차천자성공솔、일차치관성공솔급술후궤계성정맥염、정맥혈전、도관상관성감염발생솔。결과량조환자일차천자성공솔비교, P>0.05,차이무통계학의의,단실험조일차성치관성공솔명현고우대조조,치관후궤계성정맥염、정맥혈전、도관상관성감염발생솔명현저우대조조,량조비교,균P<0.001,차이구유통계학의의。결론초성인도결합새정격기술행PICC치관성공솔고,술후병발증소,안전성고。
Objective To investigate the effect of ultrasound technology combined with Seldinger technique in the catheteration of peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC).Methods One thousand and eight malignant tumor patients undergoing PICC catheteration were divided into two groups:those with visible or palpable bouncy vein as the control group(n=540)and those with invisible or impalpable elbow vein as the experiment group(n=468).The control group were treated with PICC catheteration into the elbow vein as normal control group and in the experiment group the catheteration was done into the lower part of the upper arm of the basilic vein or brachial vein as the puncture point under the guidance of ultrasound with Seldinger technique.The two groups were compared in terms of success rate of one time puncturing, success rate of one time catheterization and postoperative phlebitis,venous thrombosis and catheter related infection rate.Result There were no significant difference in the success rate for one time puncturing,while the success rate of one time catheterization in the experiment group was significantly higher than that in the control group and the mechanical phlebitis,venous thrombosis,catheter related infection rate in the experiment group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.001).Conclusion Ultrasound technology combined with Seldinger technique for PICC catheterization can obtain high success rate,lower postoperative complications and provide high security.