中华预防医学杂志
中華預防醫學雜誌
중화예방의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF
2014年
12期
1068-1071
,共4页
张建清%刘志斌%蒋友胜%李胜浓%周健%林晓仕%陆少游
張建清%劉誌斌%蔣友勝%李勝濃%週健%林曉仕%陸少遊
장건청%류지빈%장우성%리성농%주건%림효사%륙소유
毒杀芬%食品污染%气相色谱-质谱法%动物性食品
毒殺芬%食品汙染%氣相色譜-質譜法%動物性食品
독살분%식품오염%기상색보-질보법%동물성식품
Toxaphene%Food contamination%Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry%Animal originated food
目的:调查珠江三角洲地区鱼、鸡肉和畜肉中毒杀芬污染水平及其单体分布特征。方法于2010年10月至2011年6月,采用非概率抽样方法中的立意抽样方法,采集广东省惠州、广州、东莞、江门市的鱼、鸡肉和畜肉食品样品共计60份,采用同位素稀释-高分辨气相色谱/高分辨双聚焦磁式质谱联用方法( ID-HRGC/HRMS),对3种指示性毒杀芬单体Parlar 26、Parlar 50和Parlar 62进行定性定量分析,并对污染情况和特征进行比较分析。结果鱼类、鸡肉和畜肉中毒杀芬的M分别为12.87、5.8、1.89 ng/kg(本文内均为全重),差异有统计学意义(H=14.29,P=0.001);海鱼中毒杀芬含量(M =32.07 ng/kg)高于淡水鱼(M =10.63 ng/kg)(Z =-2.52,P =0.012)。鱼类中Parlar 50、Parlar 26为主要特征性污染物,分别占毒杀芬总浓度的44%(9.91/22.60,ng/kg)、39%(8.89/22.60,ng/kg);鸡肉中以Parlar 62、Parlar 26为主,分别占42%(5.03/11.90,ng/kg)和38%(4.58/11.90,ng/kg);畜肉中以Parlar 26和Parlar 62为优势单体,分别占57%(3.45/6.08,ng/kg)、26%(1.58/6.08,ng/kg)。结论珠江三角洲地区3类动物性食品毒杀芬处于较低水平,远低于欧盟食品安全局( EFSA)所规定的动物性食品中0.1 mg/kg的限量标准。3类动物性食品毒杀芬单体特征不同,反映了不同种属动物富集此类污染物的生物学差异。
目的:調查珠江三角洲地區魚、鷄肉和畜肉中毒殺芬汙染水平及其單體分佈特徵。方法于2010年10月至2011年6月,採用非概率抽樣方法中的立意抽樣方法,採集廣東省惠州、廣州、東莞、江門市的魚、鷄肉和畜肉食品樣品共計60份,採用同位素稀釋-高分辨氣相色譜/高分辨雙聚焦磁式質譜聯用方法( ID-HRGC/HRMS),對3種指示性毒殺芬單體Parlar 26、Parlar 50和Parlar 62進行定性定量分析,併對汙染情況和特徵進行比較分析。結果魚類、鷄肉和畜肉中毒殺芬的M分彆為12.87、5.8、1.89 ng/kg(本文內均為全重),差異有統計學意義(H=14.29,P=0.001);海魚中毒殺芬含量(M =32.07 ng/kg)高于淡水魚(M =10.63 ng/kg)(Z =-2.52,P =0.012)。魚類中Parlar 50、Parlar 26為主要特徵性汙染物,分彆佔毒殺芬總濃度的44%(9.91/22.60,ng/kg)、39%(8.89/22.60,ng/kg);鷄肉中以Parlar 62、Parlar 26為主,分彆佔42%(5.03/11.90,ng/kg)和38%(4.58/11.90,ng/kg);畜肉中以Parlar 26和Parlar 62為優勢單體,分彆佔57%(3.45/6.08,ng/kg)、26%(1.58/6.08,ng/kg)。結論珠江三角洲地區3類動物性食品毒殺芬處于較低水平,遠低于歐盟食品安全跼( EFSA)所規定的動物性食品中0.1 mg/kg的限量標準。3類動物性食品毒殺芬單體特徵不同,反映瞭不同種屬動物富集此類汙染物的生物學差異。
목적:조사주강삼각주지구어、계육화축육중독살분오염수평급기단체분포특정。방법우2010년10월지2011년6월,채용비개솔추양방법중적립의추양방법,채집광동성혜주、엄주、동완、강문시적어、계육화축육식품양품공계60빈,채용동위소희석-고분변기상색보/고분변쌍취초자식질보련용방법( ID-HRGC/HRMS),대3충지시성독살분단체Parlar 26、Parlar 50화Parlar 62진행정성정량분석,병대오염정황화특정진행비교분석。결과어류、계육화축육중독살분적M분별위12.87、5.8、1.89 ng/kg(본문내균위전중),차이유통계학의의(H=14.29,P=0.001);해어중독살분함량(M =32.07 ng/kg)고우담수어(M =10.63 ng/kg)(Z =-2.52,P =0.012)。어류중Parlar 50、Parlar 26위주요특정성오염물,분별점독살분총농도적44%(9.91/22.60,ng/kg)、39%(8.89/22.60,ng/kg);계육중이Parlar 62、Parlar 26위주,분별점42%(5.03/11.90,ng/kg)화38%(4.58/11.90,ng/kg);축육중이Parlar 26화Parlar 62위우세단체,분별점57%(3.45/6.08,ng/kg)、26%(1.58/6.08,ng/kg)。결론주강삼각주지구3류동물성식품독살분처우교저수평,원저우구맹식품안전국( EFSA)소규정적동물성식품중0.1 mg/kg적한량표준。3류동물성식품독살분단체특정불동,반영료불동충속동물부집차류오염물적생물학차이。
Objective To explore the present contamination status and profile of toxaphene in fish, chicken and meat samples in Pearl River Delta area.Methods Totally 60 independent samples including fish,chicken,meat were collected from Huizhou,Guangzhou,Dongguan,Jiangmen of Pearl River Delta area in Guangdong by purposive sampling from Oct 2010 to Jun 2011.Toxaphene monomer Parlar26,Parlar50 and Parlar62 levels in three various categories of foods were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed referencing international authoritative standard methods by utilizing isotope dilution high-resolution gas chromatography/high-resolution double-focusing magnetic mass spectrometry ( HRGC-HRMS ) .The levels of pollution and characteristics were compared.Results The concentration of toxaphene median(M) in fish,chicken and meat were 12.87,5.8 and 1.89 ng/kg(gross weight),respectively and the difference was significant(H=14.29,P=0.001).The toxaphene level in seafish(M=32.07 ng/kg)was significantly higher than that in freshwater fish(M=10.63 ng/kg,Z=-2.52,P=0.012).The profile analysis showed that Parlar50 and Parlar26 were the predominant characteristic monomers in fish,which contributed about 44%(9.91/22.60, ng/kg) and 39%(8.89/22.60, ng/kg) to total concentration,and Parlar62 and Parlar26 were the two predominant congeners in poultry products,the two congeners accounted for 42%(5.03/11.90, ng/kg) and 38%(4.58/11.90, ng/kg).Furthermore Parlar26 and Parlar62 made up about 57%(3.45/6.08, ng/kg) and 26% ( 1.58/6.08, ng/kg ) of total concentration in livestock meat respectively.Conclusion Toxaphene levels in all tested food samples are far lower than the limited standard stipulated by the European Food Safety Authority(EFSA) in 2002,which was 0.1 mg/kg.The congener characteristic difference in the three categories food indicated that the different enrichment ability in Toxaphene in different animal species.