实用癌症杂志
實用癌癥雜誌
실용암증잡지
THE PRACTICAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
2014年
12期
1650-1652
,共3页
田强%郭启%赵梅星%苑玉存%朱明华
田彊%郭啟%趙梅星%苑玉存%硃明華
전강%곽계%조매성%원옥존%주명화
颅内肿瘤%术后高颅内压%甘露醇%吡拉西坦注射液
顱內腫瘤%術後高顱內壓%甘露醇%吡拉西坦註射液
로내종류%술후고로내압%감로순%필랍서탄주사액
Intracranial tumor%Postoperative high intracranial pressure%Mannitol%Piracetam injection
目的:探讨甘露醇与吡拉西坦注射液治疗颅内肿瘤术后高颅内压的疗效及安全性。方法将76例颅内肿瘤术后高颅内压患者按照住院时间先后顺序分为对照组与观察组,各38例。对照组采用20%甘露醇快速静脉滴注,观察组采用20%吡拉西坦注射液治疗。统计2组患者临床治疗效果和不良反应及用药前、后颅内压增高体征及症状等情况。结果观察组用药起效时间、高峰时间、持续时间、降压幅度分别为(0.47±0.21) h、(1.00±0.42) h、(4.31±1.41)h、(10.81±4.41)mmHg,与对照组(0.48±0.23)h、(0.98±0.45)h、(4.35±1.37)h、(10.69±4.47)mmHg比较,P>0.05。观察组治疗有效率为94.74%(36/38),与对照组92.11%(35/38)比较,P>0.05;2组患者均未发生明显性不良反应,且治疗前后血常规和电解质及肝肾功能均无异常。结论相比甘露醇来说,颅内肿瘤术后高颅内压患者采用吡拉西坦注射液治疗效果相当,且二者均无明显不良反应,起效时间等指标均无明显差异性,因此临床治疗颅内肿瘤术后高颅内压患者可根据患者实际情况选择吡拉西坦注射液与甘露醇治疗。
目的:探討甘露醇與吡拉西坦註射液治療顱內腫瘤術後高顱內壓的療效及安全性。方法將76例顱內腫瘤術後高顱內壓患者按照住院時間先後順序分為對照組與觀察組,各38例。對照組採用20%甘露醇快速靜脈滴註,觀察組採用20%吡拉西坦註射液治療。統計2組患者臨床治療效果和不良反應及用藥前、後顱內壓增高體徵及癥狀等情況。結果觀察組用藥起效時間、高峰時間、持續時間、降壓幅度分彆為(0.47±0.21) h、(1.00±0.42) h、(4.31±1.41)h、(10.81±4.41)mmHg,與對照組(0.48±0.23)h、(0.98±0.45)h、(4.35±1.37)h、(10.69±4.47)mmHg比較,P>0.05。觀察組治療有效率為94.74%(36/38),與對照組92.11%(35/38)比較,P>0.05;2組患者均未髮生明顯性不良反應,且治療前後血常規和電解質及肝腎功能均無異常。結論相比甘露醇來說,顱內腫瘤術後高顱內壓患者採用吡拉西坦註射液治療效果相噹,且二者均無明顯不良反應,起效時間等指標均無明顯差異性,因此臨床治療顱內腫瘤術後高顱內壓患者可根據患者實際情況選擇吡拉西坦註射液與甘露醇治療。
목적:탐토감로순여필랍서탄주사액치료로내종류술후고로내압적료효급안전성。방법장76례로내종류술후고로내압환자안조주원시간선후순서분위대조조여관찰조,각38례。대조조채용20%감로순쾌속정맥적주,관찰조채용20%필랍서탄주사액치료。통계2조환자림상치료효과화불량반응급용약전、후로내압증고체정급증상등정황。결과관찰조용약기효시간、고봉시간、지속시간、강압폭도분별위(0.47±0.21) h、(1.00±0.42) h、(4.31±1.41)h、(10.81±4.41)mmHg,여대조조(0.48±0.23)h、(0.98±0.45)h、(4.35±1.37)h、(10.69±4.47)mmHg비교,P>0.05。관찰조치료유효솔위94.74%(36/38),여대조조92.11%(35/38)비교,P>0.05;2조환자균미발생명현성불량반응,차치료전후혈상규화전해질급간신공능균무이상。결론상비감로순래설,로내종류술후고로내압환자채용필랍서탄주사액치료효과상당,차이자균무명현불량반응,기효시간등지표균무명현차이성,인차림상치료로내종류술후고로내압환자가근거환자실제정황선택필랍서탄주사액여감로순치료。
Objective To study the efficacy and safety of mannitol and piracetam injection for postoperative high in -tracranial pressure in intracranial tumor .Methods 76 cases of intracranial tumor patients with high intracranial pressure in ac-cordance with admission time were divided into the control group and the observation group ,each with 38 cases.The control group received 20%mannitol infusion,and the observation group were treated with 20% piracetam injection.Clinical efficacy,adverse reactions ,and the signs and symptoms of increased intracranial pressure before and after treatment of the 2 groups were recorded . Results The onset time,peak time,duration,intracranial pressure reduction of the observation group were respectively (0.47 ± 0.21) h,(1 ±0.42) h,(4.31 ±1.41) h,(10.81 ±4.41) mmHg,and those of the control group were (0.48 ±0.23) h,(0.98 ±0.45) h,(4.35 ±1.37) h,(10.69 ±4.47) mmHg (P>0.05).The effective rates of the observation group and the control group were 94.74%(36/38) and 92.11%(35/38) (P>0.05);there had no obvious adverse reactions in both groups ,and blood test ,electrolytes and liver and kidney function before and after treatment had no abnormality .Conclusion Compared with mannitol,piracetam injection for postoperative high intracranial pressure in intracranial tumor has similar curative effect ,and ei-ther treatments has no obvious adverse reactions .The onset time and other indicators of the 2 treatments has no significant differ-ence,so the clinical treatment of postoperative high intracranial pressure in intracranial tumor patients should be decided accord -ing to the actual situation of patients .