中国继续医学教育
中國繼續醫學教育
중국계속의학교육
CHINA CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
2015年
1期
72-72
,共1页
腹腔镜胆囊切除%开腹手术%临床疗效%对比分析
腹腔鏡膽囊切除%開腹手術%臨床療效%對比分析
복강경담낭절제%개복수술%림상료효%대비분석
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy%Open operation%Clinical effect%Comparative analysis
目的：比较急性胆囊疾病运用腹腔镜切除术和开腹切除术治疗的临床效果。方法选择我院292例急性胆囊炎需要实施手术治疗的患者，将其均分为两组，对照组患者实施开腹胆囊切除术，观察组患者实施腹腔镜胆囊切除术，比较两组患者的临床效果。结果通过比较，两组患者的手术时间、术中胆管损伤率以及再手术率未见明显差异，而观察组患者的手术愈合情况、术中出血量、住院时间、术后排气时间均明显优于对照组，两组患者差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论急诊胆囊切除术运用腹腔镜实施患者术后恢复快、安全性高、并发症少。
目的：比較急性膽囊疾病運用腹腔鏡切除術和開腹切除術治療的臨床效果。方法選擇我院292例急性膽囊炎需要實施手術治療的患者，將其均分為兩組，對照組患者實施開腹膽囊切除術，觀察組患者實施腹腔鏡膽囊切除術，比較兩組患者的臨床效果。結果通過比較，兩組患者的手術時間、術中膽管損傷率以及再手術率未見明顯差異，而觀察組患者的手術愈閤情況、術中齣血量、住院時間、術後排氣時間均明顯優于對照組，兩組患者差異顯著（P＜0.05）。結論急診膽囊切除術運用腹腔鏡實施患者術後恢複快、安全性高、併髮癥少。
목적：비교급성담낭질병운용복강경절제술화개복절제술치료적림상효과。방법선택아원292례급성담낭염수요실시수술치료적환자，장기균분위량조，대조조환자실시개복담낭절제술，관찰조환자실시복강경담낭절제술，비교량조환자적림상효과。결과통과비교，량조환자적수술시간、술중담관손상솔이급재수술솔미견명현차이，이관찰조환자적수술유합정황、술중출혈량、주원시간、술후배기시간균명현우우대조조，량조환자차이현저（P＜0.05）。결론급진담낭절제술운용복강경실시환자술후회복쾌、안전성고、병발증소。
ObjectiveCompare the clinical effect of acute gallbladder diseases by laparoscopic resection and open resection.MethodsChose 292 cases of acute cholecystitis in our hospital, divided into two groups, the control group patients were treated with open cholecystectomy, the observation group were treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, compared the clinical effects of two groups of patients.Results By comparing the two groups of patients, operation time, bile duct injury during the operation and the rate of re operation rate had no obvious difference, the observation group patients in the operation healing, the bleeding volume during operation, hospitalization time, postoperative exhaust time were signiifcantly better than the control group, the differences between the two groups were signiifcant (P<0.05).Conclusion The use of the implementation of laparoscopic patients recovered quickly after emergency resection of gallbladder has high safety and less complications.
