CAJ | 학술논문

目的：分析急危重症患者使用急诊呼吸阶梯性治疗的效果。方法2012年2月～2014年2月期间，我院收治急危重症患者共112例，采用随机分组方式将其分为观察组和对照组各56例，对照组患者给予常规治疗。对比分析两组患者的复苏率以及呼吸稳定时间。结果观察组患者呼吸复苏成功率为96.43%（54/56）；对照组患者呼吸复苏成功率为73.21%（41/56）；同时观察组患者呼吸稳定时间为（44.2±5.3）min；对照组患者呼吸稳定时间为（54.3±6.1）min，两组间比较有显著差异（P＜0.05）。结论为进一步缩短患者呼吸稳定时间，同时提高呼吸复苏成功率，应当对患者采用阶梯性治疗，这对患者治疗能起到很大帮助。
목적：분석급위중증환자사용급진호흡계제성치료적효과。방법2012년2월～2014년2월기간，아원수치급위중증환자공112례，채용수궤분조방식장기분위관찰조화대조조각56례，대조조환자급여상규치료。대비분석량조환자적복소솔이급호흡은정시간。결과관찰조환자호흡복소성공솔위96.43%（54/56）；대조조환자호흡복소성공솔위73.21%（41/56）；동시관찰조환자호흡은정시간위（44.2±5.3）min；대조조환자호흡은정시간위（54.3±6.1）min，량조간비교유현저차이（P＜0.05）。결론위진일보축단환자호흡은정시간，동시제고호흡복소성공솔，응당대환자채용계제성치료，저대환자치료능기도흔대방조。
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of critical patients in emergency department using stepwise respiratory treatment.Methods From 2012 February to February 2014, the acute and critically patients admitted to our hospital with a total of 112 cases, randomly divided into observation group and control group with 56 cases in each group, the control group were given routine treatment. Comparative analysis of two groups of patients recovery rate and respiratory stability time.ResultsIn the observation group, patients with respiratory resuscitation success rate was 96.43% (54/56), the control group of patients with respiratory resuscitation success rate was 73.21% (41/56), while patients in observation group were respiratory stabilization time is (44.2±5.3) min; the control group of patients with respiratory stabilization time is (54.3±6.1) min, there was a signiifcant difference between two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion To further shorten the breathing in patients with stable time, and increased respiratory resuscitation success rate, should be for patients with stage treatment, the treatment for patients with helps a lot.