CAJ | 학술논문

著作权是对私有财产提供保护的权利制度，而作为一种技术规则的标准具有一定的公共物品属性，二者之间存在紧张关系。我国关于标准著作权问题的立法几近空白，域外司法实践已对这一问题有了回应。对标准提供著作权法保护，须区别对待公标准与私标准，并随着标准性质的演化而作出调整。著作权法对标准保护的态度应当是谨慎的，既要维护标准制定者的私人利益，又要维护标准使用人以及消费者的公共利益。当标准构成“基础设施”，存在限制、排除市场竞争行为时，可借助反垄断法进行干预。
저작권시대사유재산제공보호적권리제도，이작위일충기술규칙적표준구유일정적공공물품속성，이자지간존재긴장관계。아국관우표준저작권문제적입법궤근공백，역외사법실천이대저일문제유료회응。대표준제공저작권법보호，수구별대대공표준여사표준，병수착표준성질적연화이작출조정。저작권법대표준보호적태도응당시근신적，기요유호표준제정자적사인이익，우요유호표준사용인이급소비자적공공이익。당표준구성“기출설시”，존재한제、배제시장경쟁행위시，가차조반롱단법진행간예。
Copyright is to protect the rights of private property,and as technology rule,standards are pub_lic goods,with tensions between the two? China′s legislation on copyright issues of standards is almost blank ,whereas judicial practice abroad has responded to this problem? To provide protection to standards in terms of the Copyright Act shall distinguish between public and private of standards,and make adjust_ments as the nature of standards changes? Copyright legislation must make prudent response to this prob_lem,so that either the interests of private standard_setter or the public interests of the standard user and consumer are all to be maintained and safeguarded? When standards become ″infrastructure″,and re_strict and rule out competition in market behavior,Anti_monopoly Law is to be enforced as an interven_tion?