中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
36期
107-108
,共2页
中西医结合护理%股骨头坏死%生存质量
中西醫結閤護理%股骨頭壞死%生存質量
중서의결합호리%고골두배사%생존질량
Chinese medicine nursing%Femoral head necrosis%Quality of life
目的:对32例股骨头坏死患者采用全髋关节置换术,术后进行中西医结合护理模式,分析患者术后生存质量。方法:2012年10月—2013年3月期间在我院进行全髋关节置换术的股骨头坏死患者32例,随机分成观察组16例,对照组16例。观察组给予中西医结合护理,对照组给予常规护理方式护理。采用HHS(Harris hip score)和SF-12(生存质量表)对两组患者术前和手术后5个月的情况评分。结果:两组术前和术后HHS评分和SF-12评分均有统计学差异(P<0.05);术后,观察组的HHS评分与对照组相比无统计学差异(P>0.05),但 SF-12评分高于对照组,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:中西医结合护理模式能够提高股骨头坏死患者术后生存质量。值得推广。
目的:對32例股骨頭壞死患者採用全髖關節置換術,術後進行中西醫結閤護理模式,分析患者術後生存質量。方法:2012年10月—2013年3月期間在我院進行全髖關節置換術的股骨頭壞死患者32例,隨機分成觀察組16例,對照組16例。觀察組給予中西醫結閤護理,對照組給予常規護理方式護理。採用HHS(Harris hip score)和SF-12(生存質量錶)對兩組患者術前和手術後5箇月的情況評分。結果:兩組術前和術後HHS評分和SF-12評分均有統計學差異(P<0.05);術後,觀察組的HHS評分與對照組相比無統計學差異(P>0.05),但 SF-12評分高于對照組,有統計學差異(P<0.05)。結論:中西醫結閤護理模式能夠提高股骨頭壞死患者術後生存質量。值得推廣。
목적:대32례고골두배사환자채용전관관절치환술,술후진행중서의결합호리모식,분석환자술후생존질량。방법:2012년10월—2013년3월기간재아원진행전관관절치환술적고골두배사환자32례,수궤분성관찰조16례,대조조16례。관찰조급여중서의결합호리,대조조급여상규호리방식호리。채용HHS(Harris hip score)화SF-12(생존질량표)대량조환자술전화수술후5개월적정황평분。결과:량조술전화술후HHS평분화SF-12평분균유통계학차이(P<0.05);술후,관찰조적HHS평분여대조조상비무통계학차이(P>0.05),단 SF-12평분고우대조조,유통계학차이(P<0.05)。결론:중서의결합호리모식능구제고고골두배사환자술후생존질량。치득추엄。
Objective:32 cases of avascular necrosis of the femoral head were treated by total hip replacement surgery, postoperative combine traditional Chinese and Western medicine nursing model, quality of survival analysis of patients after operation. Methods: 32 patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head during October 2013 March 2012 a total hip replacement in our hospital were randomly divided into the observation group of 16 cases, 16 cases of the control group. The observation group was treated with traditional Chinese and Western medicine nursing, the control group was given routine nursing care mode. Using HHS (Harris hip score) and SF-12 (WHOQOL-100) score of 5 months in patients of two groups before and after operation. Results:the difference of HHS score and SF-12 score were statistically in two groups before and after operation (P<0.05)?after operation, no statistically significant difference compared to the observation group HHS score and the control group (P>0.05), but SF-12 was higher than that of the control group, there were significant differences (P<0.05) conclusion: to quality survival improve the avascular necrosis of the femoral head in patients with postoperative nursing mode of combining traditional Chinese and Western medicine. It is worth popularization.