中国感染控制杂志
中國感染控製雜誌
중국감염공제잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL
2014年
12期
720-723
,共4页
郑小凌%钟昱文%陈惠珍%王雅静%王冰姝%韩春华%沈秀婷%邹钦
鄭小凌%鐘昱文%陳惠珍%王雅靜%王冰姝%韓春華%瀋秀婷%鄒欽
정소릉%종욱문%진혜진%왕아정%왕빙주%한춘화%침수정%추흠
口腔科%综合治疗台水路%细菌污染%手机喷水%冲洗水%水源水%水质监测%消毒%医院感染
口腔科%綜閤治療檯水路%細菌汙染%手機噴水%遲洗水%水源水%水質鑑測%消毒%醫院感染
구강과%종합치료태수로%세균오염%수궤분수%충세수%수원수%수질감측%소독%의원감염
dental unit waterline%bacterial contamination%handpiece spray water%flushing water%source water%water quality monitor%healthcare-associated infection
目的:了解综合性医院口腔科综合治疗台水路(DUWL)污染状况,为采取相应预防措施提供科学依据。方法选取3所综合医院,A 医院以自来水作为直接水源,B 医院以蓄水池水作为水源,C 医院以反渗透水过滤系统过滤水作为水源,每季度对医院综合治疗椅的手机喷水和冲洗水进行水样采集,检测水样细菌菌落总数。结果 A 医院水源水合格率为75.00%(3/4);DUWL 手机喷水和冲洗水合格率均为0(0/40),菌落数分别为(1.20×103~5.53×104)CFU/mL(M=3.80×104 CFU/mL)、(2.11×104~1.66×105)CFU/mL(M=4.80×104 CFU/mL)。B 医院水源水、手机喷水和冲洗水合格率分别为50.00%(2/4)、60.00%(24/40)和72.50%(29/40),手机喷水和冲洗水菌落数分别为(0.00~3.71×106)CFU/mL(M=83.00 CFU/mL)、(0.00~2.39×106)CFU/mL (M=72.00 CFU/mL)。C 医院水源水合格率100.00%(4/4);手机喷水和冲洗水合格率分别为55.00%(22/40)和65.00%(26/40),菌落数分别为(0.00~6.20×103)CFU/mL(M=96.00 CFU/mL)、(0.00~1.63×103)CFU/mL(M=87.50 CFU/mL)。结论综合医院口腔科 DUWL 细菌污染严重,应加强对水源水的过滤消毒和 DUWL 的日常消毒与规范化管理。
目的:瞭解綜閤性醫院口腔科綜閤治療檯水路(DUWL)汙染狀況,為採取相應預防措施提供科學依據。方法選取3所綜閤醫院,A 醫院以自來水作為直接水源,B 醫院以蓄水池水作為水源,C 醫院以反滲透水過濾繫統過濾水作為水源,每季度對醫院綜閤治療椅的手機噴水和遲洗水進行水樣採集,檢測水樣細菌菌落總數。結果 A 醫院水源水閤格率為75.00%(3/4);DUWL 手機噴水和遲洗水閤格率均為0(0/40),菌落數分彆為(1.20×103~5.53×104)CFU/mL(M=3.80×104 CFU/mL)、(2.11×104~1.66×105)CFU/mL(M=4.80×104 CFU/mL)。B 醫院水源水、手機噴水和遲洗水閤格率分彆為50.00%(2/4)、60.00%(24/40)和72.50%(29/40),手機噴水和遲洗水菌落數分彆為(0.00~3.71×106)CFU/mL(M=83.00 CFU/mL)、(0.00~2.39×106)CFU/mL (M=72.00 CFU/mL)。C 醫院水源水閤格率100.00%(4/4);手機噴水和遲洗水閤格率分彆為55.00%(22/40)和65.00%(26/40),菌落數分彆為(0.00~6.20×103)CFU/mL(M=96.00 CFU/mL)、(0.00~1.63×103)CFU/mL(M=87.50 CFU/mL)。結論綜閤醫院口腔科 DUWL 細菌汙染嚴重,應加彊對水源水的過濾消毒和 DUWL 的日常消毒與規範化管理。
목적:료해종합성의원구강과종합치료태수로(DUWL)오염상황,위채취상응예방조시제공과학의거。방법선취3소종합의원,A 의원이자래수작위직접수원,B 의원이축수지수작위수원,C 의원이반삼투수과려계통과려수작위수원,매계도대의원종합치료의적수궤분수화충세수진행수양채집,검측수양세균균락총수。결과 A 의원수원수합격솔위75.00%(3/4);DUWL 수궤분수화충세수합격솔균위0(0/40),균락수분별위(1.20×103~5.53×104)CFU/mL(M=3.80×104 CFU/mL)、(2.11×104~1.66×105)CFU/mL(M=4.80×104 CFU/mL)。B 의원수원수、수궤분수화충세수합격솔분별위50.00%(2/4)、60.00%(24/40)화72.50%(29/40),수궤분수화충세수균락수분별위(0.00~3.71×106)CFU/mL(M=83.00 CFU/mL)、(0.00~2.39×106)CFU/mL (M=72.00 CFU/mL)。C 의원수원수합격솔100.00%(4/4);수궤분수화충세수합격솔분별위55.00%(22/40)화65.00%(26/40),균락수분별위(0.00~6.20×103)CFU/mL(M=96.00 CFU/mL)、(0.00~1.63×103)CFU/mL(M=87.50 CFU/mL)。결론종합의원구강과 DUWL 세균오염엄중,응가강대수원수적과려소독화 DUWL 적일상소독여규범화관리。
Objective To realize the contamination status of dental unit waterlines (DUWL)in general hospitals, and provide scientific evidence for making preventive measures.Methods Three hospitals were selected for study, water source adopted by hospital A,B and C was running water,reservoir water,and filtered water through reverse osmosis filtration system respectively,specimens of dental handpiece spray water and flushing water of dental chair units were collected quarterly,total bacterial colony in water were detected.Results The qualified rate of source wa-ter,handpiece spray water,and flushing water in hospital A was 75.00%(3/4),0 (0/40)and 0 (0/40)respectively,col-ony count of handpiece spray water and flushing water was (1.20×103 -5.53×104 )CFU/mL(M=3.80×104 CFU/mL) and (2.11×104 -1.66×105 )CFU/mL(M=4.80×104 CFU/mL)respectively.The qualified rate of source water,hand-piece spray water,and flushing water in hospital B was 50.00%(2/4),60.00%(24/40)and 72.50%(29/40)respectively, colony count of handpiece spray water and flushing water was (0.00 -3.71 ×106 )CFU/mL(M=83.00 CFU/mL)and (0.00-2.39×106 )CFU/mL(M=72.00 CFU/mL)respectively.The qualified rate of source water,handpiece spray wa-ter,and flushing water in hospital C was 100.00%(4/4),55.00%(22/40)and 65.00%(26/40)respectively,colony count of handpiece spray water and flushing water was (0.00-6.20×103 )CFU/mL(M=96.00 CFU/mL)and(0.00-1.63×103 )CFU/mL(M=87.50 CFU/mL)respectively.Conclusion Water of DUWL in general hospitals is seriously con-taminated,disinfection and standardized management of source water and DUWL must be strengthened.