陕西中医
陝西中醫
협서중의
SHAANXI JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
1期
98-100
,共3页
结肠炎,溃疡性/中医药疗法%埋线%穴, 中脘%穴, 足三里%穴, 天枢
結腸炎,潰瘍性/中醫藥療法%埋線%穴, 中脘%穴, 足三裏%穴, 天樞
결장염,궤양성/중의약요법%매선%혈, 중완%혈, 족삼리%혈, 천추
Colitis,Ulcerative/traditional Chinese medicine therapy%Embedding,Thread%Point CV12 (Zhongwan)%Point ST36(Zusanli)%Point ST25(Tianshu)
目的:观察穴位埋线疗法治疗轻、中度溃疡性结肠炎的疗效。方法:将66例轻、中度溃疡性结肠炎患者随机分为穴位埋线组及对照组。穴位埋线组采用针刺埋线中脘、足三里、天枢穴等穴;对照组采用口服美沙拉嗪颗粒。观察、比较6周后2组间疗效,及1年后总复发率。结果:穴位埋线组6周后的总有效率为85.29%,对照组总有效率为62.5%,比较有统计学差异(χ2=4.479,P<0.05),1年后的总复发率穴位埋线组为10.34%,对照组为40.00%,比较有统计学差异(χ2=5.259,P<0.05)。结论:穴位埋线疗法对轻、中度溃疡性结肠炎患者有较好的疗效。
目的:觀察穴位埋線療法治療輕、中度潰瘍性結腸炎的療效。方法:將66例輕、中度潰瘍性結腸炎患者隨機分為穴位埋線組及對照組。穴位埋線組採用針刺埋線中脘、足三裏、天樞穴等穴;對照組採用口服美沙拉嗪顆粒。觀察、比較6週後2組間療效,及1年後總複髮率。結果:穴位埋線組6週後的總有效率為85.29%,對照組總有效率為62.5%,比較有統計學差異(χ2=4.479,P<0.05),1年後的總複髮率穴位埋線組為10.34%,對照組為40.00%,比較有統計學差異(χ2=5.259,P<0.05)。結論:穴位埋線療法對輕、中度潰瘍性結腸炎患者有較好的療效。
목적:관찰혈위매선요법치료경、중도궤양성결장염적료효。방법:장66례경、중도궤양성결장염환자수궤분위혈위매선조급대조조。혈위매선조채용침자매선중완、족삼리、천추혈등혈;대조조채용구복미사랍진과립。관찰、비교6주후2조간료효,급1년후총복발솔。결과:혈위매선조6주후적총유효솔위85.29%,대조조총유효솔위62.5%,비교유통계학차이(χ2=4.479,P<0.05),1년후적총복발솔혈위매선조위10.34%,대조조위40.00%,비교유통계학차이(χ2=5.259,P<0.05)。결론:혈위매선요법대경、중도궤양성결장염환자유교호적료효。
Objective :To observe the clinical efficacy of acupoint catgut embedding in Treating mild and mod‐erate Ulcerative Colitis .Methods :Sixty‐six patients with mild and moderate Ulcerative Colitis were randomized into treatment group and control group .The treatment group was embed catgut in acupoint of zhongwan、zusanli、tianshu etc . The control group oral Mesalazine .After 6 weeks ,the clinical efficacies of the 2 groups were compared .Results :Total ef‐fective treatment rate in treatment and control groups were 85 .29% vs 65 .2% ,χ2 =4 .479 ,P<0 .05 .There was signifi‐cant difference between the two groups .1 years total recurrence rate in treatment and control groups were 10 .34% vs 40 . 00% ,χ2 =5 .259 ,P<0 .05 .There also have significant difference between the two groups .Conclusion :Acupoint catgut embedding is an effective way in treating mild and moderate Ulcerative Colitis .