陕西医学杂志
陝西醫學雜誌
협서의학잡지
SHAANXI MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
1期
29-32
,共4页
宋彦彬%郝东宁%刘琦%李乔
宋彥彬%郝東寧%劉琦%李喬
송언빈%학동저%류기%리교
颅内动脉疾病/治疗%支架/治疗应用%手术中并发症%随访研究%Wingspan支架
顱內動脈疾病/治療%支架/治療應用%手術中併髮癥%隨訪研究%Wingspan支架
로내동맥질병/치료%지가/치료응용%수술중병발증%수방연구%Wingspan지가
Intracranial arterial diseases/therapy%Stents/therapeutic use%Intraoperative complica-tions%Follow-upstudies%Wingspanstents
目的:探讨Wingspan支架对症状性颅内动脉狭窄的治疗情况,评价其安全性及可行性。方法:应用Wing span支架治疗症状性颅内动脉狭窄患者36例,观察围手术期情况及术后随访情况,观察支架置入的手术成功率、狭窄率的改变、围手术期并发症、临床随访及影像学随访结果。结果:本组36例手术成功率为100%,围手术期(术后30d)并发症发生率为5.6%(2例)。28例患者接受了影像学(DSA或CTA)随访,在12个月随访期间,2例患者出现无症状性支架内再狭窄,1例患者出现症状性支架内再狭窄,再狭窄率为10.7%,1年不良事件发生率为8.3%。结论:对药物难治性症状性颅内动脉狭窄患者行Wing span支架成形术是有效、可行的。
目的:探討Wingspan支架對癥狀性顱內動脈狹窄的治療情況,評價其安全性及可行性。方法:應用Wing span支架治療癥狀性顱內動脈狹窄患者36例,觀察圍手術期情況及術後隨訪情況,觀察支架置入的手術成功率、狹窄率的改變、圍手術期併髮癥、臨床隨訪及影像學隨訪結果。結果:本組36例手術成功率為100%,圍手術期(術後30d)併髮癥髮生率為5.6%(2例)。28例患者接受瞭影像學(DSA或CTA)隨訪,在12箇月隨訪期間,2例患者齣現無癥狀性支架內再狹窄,1例患者齣現癥狀性支架內再狹窄,再狹窄率為10.7%,1年不良事件髮生率為8.3%。結論:對藥物難治性癥狀性顱內動脈狹窄患者行Wing span支架成形術是有效、可行的。
목적:탐토Wingspan지가대증상성로내동맥협착적치료정황,평개기안전성급가행성。방법:응용Wing span지가치료증상성로내동맥협착환자36례,관찰위수술기정황급술후수방정황,관찰지가치입적수술성공솔、협착솔적개변、위수술기병발증、림상수방급영상학수방결과。결과:본조36례수술성공솔위100%,위수술기(술후30d)병발증발생솔위5.6%(2례)。28례환자접수료영상학(DSA혹CTA)수방,재12개월수방기간,2례환자출현무증상성지가내재협착,1례환자출현증상성지가내재협착,재협착솔위10.7%,1년불량사건발생솔위8.3%。결론:대약물난치성증상성로내동맥협착환자행Wing span지가성형술시유효、가행적。
Objective:To retrospectively analyze the treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial steno‐sis with Wingspan stent and to evaluate the feasibility and safety. Methods :36 patients with symptomatic intracrani‐al arterial stenosis were treated by Wingspan stent. The operative successful rate, the degree of stenosis, periopera‐tive complications and the results of clinical and imaging follow‐up were observed. Results:The technical success rate was 100%. The rate of procedure‐related complications during the perioperative period (30 days) was 5. 6% (two of 36 patients). Twenty‐eight patients were available for follow‐up imaging with DSA or CTA. During 12 months, One patient was symptomatic in‐stent restenosis (ISR), two patient was asymptomatic in‐stent restenosis (ISR). The restenosis rate was 10. 7%. The adverse event rate was 8. 3% at 1 year. Conclusion:For refractory symptomatic in‐tracranial arterial stenosis, Wingspan stents is an effective and feasible technique. But in the long term, we need fur‐ther follow up.