CAJ | 학술논문

刑事诉讼立法保护亲密的配偶关系，和追诉犯罪一样，有助于维护社会和谐。一些国家和地区注重保护实质性的配偶关系、落实保护机制、有取舍地予以保护。在我国，非法证据排除规则不能全面地保护配偶关系；配偶可能从对方犯罪的潜在证人转变为包庇、窝藏罪的被追诉人，从而难以发挥对配偶关系的刑事诉讼立法保护；此外，配偶的拒绝出庭作证特权有被架空的倾向。不妨将配偶的拒绝出庭作证特权改为配偶拒绝当面作证特权，在此基础上扩大有权拒绝当面作证的主体范围；并且赋予配偶免于强制搜查权。
형사소송입법보호친밀적배우관계，화추소범죄일양，유조우유호사회화해。일사국가화지구주중보호실질성적배우관계、락실보호궤제、유취사지여이보호。재아국，비법증거배제규칙불능전면지보호배우관계；배우가능종대방범죄적잠재증인전변위포비、와장죄적피추소인，종이난이발휘대배우관계적형사소송입법보호；차외，배우적거절출정작증특권유피가공적경향。불방장배우적거절출정작증특권개위배우거절당면작증특권，재차기출상확대유권거절당면작증적주체범위；병차부여배우면우강제수사권。
Like prosecuting crime, protecting spouse relationship based on the criminal procedure law is conducive to social harmony. Some countries and regions attach importance to protecting substantive spouse relationship by implementing mechanisms for trade-off protections. In China,the rule of illegal evidence exclusion only plays limited role in this respect: it is likely for a spouse to turn from a potential witness into a suspect due to the crimes such as harboring and covering,making legislative protection for spouse relationship in criminal procedures impractical; the privilege of refusing to appear in court and testify against one’s spouse has the tendency of malfunction. It is thus suggested that the privilege be modified into one allowing spouses to refuse face-to face testifying,the scope of those who enjoy this privilege be expanded and the spouses be exempt from mandatory searches.