CAJ | 학술논문

埃伦?伍德批评20世纪70年代后西方新左翼在理论上日渐背离经典马克思主义，其中以普兰查斯、拉克劳与墨菲、后现代主义最为典型。在她看来，普兰查斯过分抬高了意识形态与政治的重要性，其理论中存在诸多矛盾与混乱，并具有很大的危害；而拉克劳与墨菲的理论中存在诸多对马克思和马克思主义的误读，其“激进民主”方案也缺乏可靠的社会根基，政治策略本质上是一种改良主义；后现代主义的产生有其特定的历史根源，其理论逻辑混乱，政治主张亦具有很大的迷惑性并可能导致严重后果。伍德批判的出发点在于捍卫经典马克思主义的思想地位，其中贯穿着马克思主义思维方法，但在有些问题上批判过于笼统，分寸上也不是很适当。
애륜?오덕비평20세기70년대후서방신좌익재이론상일점배리경전마극사주의，기중이보란사사、랍극로여묵비、후현대주의최위전형。재저간래，보란사사과분태고료의식형태여정치적중요성，기이론중존재제다모순여혼란，병구유흔대적위해；이랍극로여묵비적이론중존재제다대마극사화마극사주의적오독，기“격진민주”방안야결핍가고적사회근기，정치책략본질상시일충개량주의；후현대주의적산생유기특정적역사근원，기이론라집혼란，정치주장역구유흔대적미혹성병가능도치엄중후과。오덕비판적출발점재우한위경전마극사주의적사상지위，기중관천착마극사주의사유방법，단재유사문제상비판과우롱통，분촌상야불시흔괄당。
Ellen Meiksins Wood criticizes that the western New Left gradually deviate from classical marxism in theory after 1970s among whom Nicos Poulantzas, Laclau/Mouffe and Postmodernism are typical.In her opinion, Poulantzas raises the importance of ideology and politics too much and there are many mistakes and chaos in his theory which has a great deal of harm .She insists that there is a lot of misunderstanding in Laclau and Mouffe's theory, that its"Radical Democracy"scheme is lack of reliable social foun-dation and its political strategy is essentially a kind of reformism .In addition, Wood analyses the specific historical roots of the Post-modernism , reveals its logical chaos in theory and indicates its politics is confusing which may have serious consequences .The start-ing point of Wood's criticism is guarding classical marxism, and the thinking method of it is marxist, but it is inappropriate in some other aspects, such as discretion.