临床肺科杂志
臨床肺科雜誌
림상폐과잡지
JOUNAL OF CLINICAL PULMONARY MEDICINE
2015年
2期
287-289,290
,共4页
自发性气胸%单操作孔%电视胸腔镜
自髮性氣胸%單操作孔%電視胸腔鏡
자발성기흉%단조작공%전시흉강경
spontaneous pneumothorax%uniportal%video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
目的:比较单操作孔胸腔镜(video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery,VATS)与传统三孔胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸的临床效果。方法选取2011年5月至2014年5月于我院肺大疱自发性气胸手术病人,分为单孔VATS组30例和传统三孔VATS组31例,观察病人手术时间、术中出血量、术后胸腔闭式引流管放置时间、住院时间、术后对切口的满意度、并发症的发生情况,记录术后6 h和24 h的疼痛评分。结果单孔VATS组的手术时间(131.37±14.15 min)长于传统三孔胸腔镜组(114.21±11.11 min)(P=0.03),术后6 h疼痛评分(3.31±1.47)低于传统VATS组(4.69±1.38)(P=0.01),术后病人对切口的满意度评分(4.76±2.13)高于传统VATS组(2.60±1.76)(P=0.02),术中出血量、胸腔闭式引流管引流量及放置时间、术后24 h疼痛评分、住院时间,以及并发症的发生率等比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论单操作孔胸腔镜手术治疗肺大疱自发性气胸可减轻术后疼痛,美容效果好,且并不增加手术风险。可以作为肺大疱自发性气胸病人首选术式。
目的:比較單操作孔胸腔鏡(video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery,VATS)與傳統三孔胸腔鏡手術治療自髮性氣胸的臨床效果。方法選取2011年5月至2014年5月于我院肺大皰自髮性氣胸手術病人,分為單孔VATS組30例和傳統三孔VATS組31例,觀察病人手術時間、術中齣血量、術後胸腔閉式引流管放置時間、住院時間、術後對切口的滿意度、併髮癥的髮生情況,記錄術後6 h和24 h的疼痛評分。結果單孔VATS組的手術時間(131.37±14.15 min)長于傳統三孔胸腔鏡組(114.21±11.11 min)(P=0.03),術後6 h疼痛評分(3.31±1.47)低于傳統VATS組(4.69±1.38)(P=0.01),術後病人對切口的滿意度評分(4.76±2.13)高于傳統VATS組(2.60±1.76)(P=0.02),術中齣血量、胸腔閉式引流管引流量及放置時間、術後24 h疼痛評分、住院時間,以及併髮癥的髮生率等比較差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論單操作孔胸腔鏡手術治療肺大皰自髮性氣胸可減輕術後疼痛,美容效果好,且併不增加手術風險。可以作為肺大皰自髮性氣胸病人首選術式。
목적:비교단조작공흉강경(video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery,VATS)여전통삼공흉강경수술치료자발성기흉적림상효과。방법선취2011년5월지2014년5월우아원폐대포자발성기흉수술병인,분위단공VATS조30례화전통삼공VATS조31례,관찰병인수술시간、술중출혈량、술후흉강폐식인류관방치시간、주원시간、술후대절구적만의도、병발증적발생정황,기록술후6 h화24 h적동통평분。결과단공VATS조적수술시간(131.37±14.15 min)장우전통삼공흉강경조(114.21±11.11 min)(P=0.03),술후6 h동통평분(3.31±1.47)저우전통VATS조(4.69±1.38)(P=0.01),술후병인대절구적만의도평분(4.76±2.13)고우전통VATS조(2.60±1.76)(P=0.02),술중출혈량、흉강폐식인류관인류량급방치시간、술후24 h동통평분、주원시간,이급병발증적발생솔등비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론단조작공흉강경수술치료폐대포자발성기흉가감경술후동통,미용효과호,차병불증가수술풍험。가이작위폐대포자발성기흉병인수선술식。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of surgical treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax be-tween uniportal and conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).Methods 61 patients with sponta-neous pneumothorax were selected in our hospital from May 201 1 to May 201 4,and they were divided into the unipor-tal VATS group (30 cases)and the conventional VATS group (31 cases).Their operation time,intraoperative blood loss,closed chest drainage tube replacement time after operation,duration of hospital stay,satisfaction and complica-tions were observed.The score of pain was recorded 6 and 24 hours after the operation.Results The operation time was (1 31 .37 ±1 4.1 5 min)in the uniportal VATS group,which was longer than that in the conventional VATS group (114.21 ±11.11min)(P=0.03).The score of pain 6h after the operation was (3.31 ±1.47)in the uniportal VATS group,which was lower than that in the conventional VATS group (4.69 ±1.38)(P=0.01 ).The satisfac-tion score of postoperative incision was (4.76 ±2.1 3 )in the uniportal VATS group,which was higher than that of the conventional VATS group (2.60 ±1.76)(P=0.02).There was no significant difference in blood loss,postop-erative drainage volume of closed thoracic drainage tube and duration,pain score 24h after the operation,duration of hospital stay and complications between the two groups (P>0.05 ).Conclusion The uniportal VATS can reduce postoperative pain and get good cosmetic effect in the treatment of patients with spontaneous pneumothorax.