国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2014年
24期
3679-3682
,共4页
王硕%马桂贤%代成波%张雄%马腾云%杨哲贤
王碩%馬桂賢%代成波%張雄%馬騰雲%楊哲賢
왕석%마계현%대성파%장웅%마등운%양철현
颈动脉狭窄%支架成形术%多模式影像
頸動脈狹窄%支架成形術%多模式影像
경동맥협착%지가성형술%다모식영상
Carotid stenosis%Stenting%Multimode image
目的 评估多模式影像指导下支架成形术治疗颅外颈动脉狭窄的可行性和安全性.方法 从2010年1月至2013年12月,入选颅外颈动脉狭窄患者100例,随机分为常规颈动脉狭窄支架成形成术组(常规CAS组)和多模式影像指导下颈动脉狭窄支架成形成术组(个体化CAS组),各50例,完整地评估神经专科的情况,常规CAS组和个体化CAS组年龄、性别差异无统计学意义.结果 常规CAS组和个体化CAS组技术成功率均为100%.围手术期总并发症:l4.0%和12.0%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),神经系统并发症:6.0%和4.0%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).随访6个月,常规CAS组和个体化CAS组脑血管事件发生率分别为:12.0%和8.0%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),血管再狭窄率分别为:24.0%和6.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 多模式影像指导颅外颈动脉狭窄支架成形术能降低远期血管再狭窄率,但尚未能降低远期脑血管事件发生率,支架成形术是治疗颅外颈动脉狭窄的可行和安全方法之一.
目的 評估多模式影像指導下支架成形術治療顱外頸動脈狹窄的可行性和安全性.方法 從2010年1月至2013年12月,入選顱外頸動脈狹窄患者100例,隨機分為常規頸動脈狹窄支架成形成術組(常規CAS組)和多模式影像指導下頸動脈狹窄支架成形成術組(箇體化CAS組),各50例,完整地評估神經專科的情況,常規CAS組和箇體化CAS組年齡、性彆差異無統計學意義.結果 常規CAS組和箇體化CAS組技術成功率均為100%.圍手術期總併髮癥:l4.0%和12.0%,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),神經繫統併髮癥:6.0%和4.0%,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).隨訪6箇月,常規CAS組和箇體化CAS組腦血管事件髮生率分彆為:12.0%和8.0%,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),血管再狹窄率分彆為:24.0%和6.0%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 多模式影像指導顱外頸動脈狹窄支架成形術能降低遠期血管再狹窄率,但尚未能降低遠期腦血管事件髮生率,支架成形術是治療顱外頸動脈狹窄的可行和安全方法之一.
목적 평고다모식영상지도하지가성형술치료로외경동맥협착적가행성화안전성.방법 종2010년1월지2013년12월,입선로외경동맥협착환자100례,수궤분위상규경동맥협착지가성형성술조(상규CAS조)화다모식영상지도하경동맥협착지가성형성술조(개체화CAS조),각50례,완정지평고신경전과적정황,상규CAS조화개체화CAS조년령、성별차이무통계학의의.결과 상규CAS조화개체화CAS조기술성공솔균위100%.위수술기총병발증:l4.0%화12.0%,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),신경계통병발증:6.0%화4.0%,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).수방6개월,상규CAS조화개체화CAS조뇌혈관사건발생솔분별위:12.0%화8.0%,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),혈관재협착솔분별위:24.0%화6.0%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 다모식영상지도로외경동맥협착지가성형술능강저원기혈관재협착솔,단상미능강저원기뇌혈관사건발생솔,지가성형술시치료로외경동맥협착적가행화안전방법지일.
Objective To assess the feasibility and safety of stenting of extracranial carotid stenosis by multimode image.Methods 100 cases of extracranial carotid stenosis from January 2010 to December 2013 were randomly divided into routine CAS group (routine stenting of extracranial carotid stenosis) and individual CAS group (stenting of extracranial carotid stenosis by multimode image),50 cases in each group.Patients' neurological conditions were completely assessed.There were no statistically significant differences in age and gender between two groups.Results The technical success rate was 100% in both two groups.The rate of perioperative complications was 14.0% in routine CAS group,and 12.0% in individual CAS group,without statistically significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05).The rate of nervous system complications in routine CAS group was 6.0%,and 4.0% in individual CAS group,without statistically significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05).After 6 months of follow up,the rate of cerebrovascular events in routine CAS group was 12.0%,and 8.0% in individual CAS group,without statistically significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05); the rate of vascular restenosis in routine CAS group was 24.0%,and 6.0% in individual CAS group,with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).Conclusions Stenting of extracranial carotid stenosis by multimode image can decrease the rate of long-term vascular restenosis,but fails to decrease the rate of long-term cerebrovascular disease.Stenting is one of feasible and safe methods in the treatment of extracranial carotid stenosis.