国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2014年
24期
3663-3666
,共4页
王云秀%雷艳梅%文翠坤%林海标%万泽民%陈炜烨%吴晓宾%庄俊华%王建兵
王雲秀%雷豔梅%文翠坤%林海標%萬澤民%陳煒燁%吳曉賓%莊俊華%王建兵
왕운수%뢰염매%문취곤%림해표%만택민%진위엽%오효빈%장준화%왕건병
试剂批号%临床标本%质控品%基质效应
試劑批號%臨床標本%質控品%基質效應
시제비호%림상표본%질공품%기질효응
Lots of reagents%Clinical samples%Quality control materials%Matrix effect
目的 探讨临床标本在验证不同批号生化试剂对临床检验结果是否具有一致性的作用.方法 分别使用新旧两个批号试剂对5个不同浓度的新鲜血清标本、Roche配套质控品和Biorad质控品的13常规临床生化项目进行测定,并对结果进行统计学分析.计算各项目更换试剂批号前后之间的偏移,以美国临床医学检验部门修正法规(CLIA' 88)允许总误差的1/3为标准,判断结果是否在允许范围内.结果 各项目在更换试剂批号后质控结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而临床标本中的丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、尿酸(UA)、总胆固醇(TC)和载脂蛋白A(APOA)等四个项目的测定结果却有统计学意义(P< 0.05),但其偏移却在1/3 CLIA' 88可接受范围内,分别为2.57%、4.41%、1.81%和3.84%,可以满足临床需要.结论 由于质控品基质效应的存在,质控品的结果并不能真实反应更换试剂批号后临床标本结果的一致情况,为了解决这个问题,建议最好同时使用质控品和临床标本进行更换试剂前后的比对.
目的 探討臨床標本在驗證不同批號生化試劑對臨床檢驗結果是否具有一緻性的作用.方法 分彆使用新舊兩箇批號試劑對5箇不同濃度的新鮮血清標本、Roche配套質控品和Biorad質控品的13常規臨床生化項目進行測定,併對結果進行統計學分析.計算各項目更換試劑批號前後之間的偏移,以美國臨床醫學檢驗部門脩正法規(CLIA' 88)允許總誤差的1/3為標準,判斷結果是否在允許範圍內.結果 各項目在更換試劑批號後質控結果差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),而臨床標本中的丙氨痠氨基轉移酶(ALT)、尿痠(UA)、總膽固醇(TC)和載脂蛋白A(APOA)等四箇項目的測定結果卻有統計學意義(P< 0.05),但其偏移卻在1/3 CLIA' 88可接受範圍內,分彆為2.57%、4.41%、1.81%和3.84%,可以滿足臨床需要.結論 由于質控品基質效應的存在,質控品的結果併不能真實反應更換試劑批號後臨床標本結果的一緻情況,為瞭解決這箇問題,建議最好同時使用質控品和臨床標本進行更換試劑前後的比對.
목적 탐토림상표본재험증불동비호생화시제대림상검험결과시부구유일치성적작용.방법 분별사용신구량개비호시제대5개불동농도적신선혈청표본、Roche배투질공품화Biorad질공품적13상규림상생화항목진행측정,병대결과진행통계학분석.계산각항목경환시제비호전후지간적편이,이미국림상의학검험부문수정법규(CLIA' 88)윤허총오차적1/3위표준,판단결과시부재윤허범위내.결과 각항목재경환시제비호후질공결과차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),이림상표본중적병안산안기전이매(ALT)、뇨산(UA)、총담고순(TC)화재지단백A(APOA)등사개항목적측정결과각유통계학의의(P< 0.05),단기편이각재1/3 CLIA' 88가접수범위내,분별위2.57%、4.41%、1.81%화3.84%,가이만족림상수요.결론 유우질공품기질효응적존재,질공품적결과병불능진실반응경환시제비호후림상표본결과적일치정황,위료해결저개문제,건의최호동시사용질공품화림상표본진행경환시제전후적비대.
Objective To study the role of clinical patient samples in verifying consistency of clinical results between different reagent lots.Methods The results of 5 clinical samples,Roche quality control materials and Biorad quality control materials for 13 clinical routine biochemical tests were obtained by using both old and new reagent lot,and performed the statistics.The bias of 13 measurands were computed after changing reagent lots,and also were judged according to the 1/3 limits of CLIA' 88 defined acceptable error,whether the bias was conform to clinical requirements or not.Results QC material results had no significant difference between two reagent lots (P > 0.05).The results of ALT,UA,TC and ApoA for patient samples had significant difference (P < 0.05),but the bias of these items were within the 1/3 limits of CLIA' 88 defined acceptable error,which were 2.57%,4.41%,1.81% and 3.84% respectively,in accordance with clinical requirement.Conclusions As there is matrix effect of quality control materials,the results for QC materials should not be used to verify the consistency of results for patient samples when changing reagent lots.To overcome this situation,we should use quality control materials together with clinical samples to compare consistency of results after changing reagent lots.