中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中華勞動衛生職業病雜誌
중화노동위생직업병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
2014年
12期
928-930
,共3页
郭蕾%叶华%潘利伟%孙来芳%应斌宇
郭蕾%葉華%潘利偉%孫來芳%應斌宇
곽뢰%협화%반리위%손래방%응빈우
重症有机磷农药中毒%血液灌流%血液透析%临床疗效
重癥有機燐農藥中毒%血液灌流%血液透析%臨床療效
중증유궤린농약중독%혈액관류%혈액투석%림상료효
Severe organophosphate pesticide poisoning%Hemoperfusion%Hemodialysis%Clinical effect
目的 探讨血液灌流联合血液透析对重症有机磷农药中毒患者的临床疗效.方法 选取2005年3月至2013年9月来我院急诊科就诊的98例重度有机磷农药中毒患者的临床资料,按照救治措施分为对照组和治疗组两组,每组49例;对照组患者给予常规急救治疗,观察组患者在常规治疗的基础上给予血液灌流联合血液透析采用血液灌流;对比两组患者的临床疗效及并发症情况.结果 对照组35例治愈,14例死亡,治愈率为71.4%;治疗组治愈46例,死亡3例,治愈率93.9%;观察组治愈率明显高于对照组对照组(x2=8.611,P<0.05);且观察组的昏迷至清醒时间、平均住院时间、胆碱酯酶活力恢复时间及阿托品用量均较少于对照组(均P<0.01).对照组出现尿潴留18例明显多于观察组的6例(x2=4.991,P<0.05);且对照组出现中间综合征、呼吸衰竭、迟发型神经损害、反跳例数均多于对照组.结论 血液灌流联合血液透析用于重症有机磷农药中毒患者的抢救治疗临床疗效好,且可显著减少患者并发症的发生,值得临床推广.
目的 探討血液灌流聯閤血液透析對重癥有機燐農藥中毒患者的臨床療效.方法 選取2005年3月至2013年9月來我院急診科就診的98例重度有機燐農藥中毒患者的臨床資料,按照救治措施分為對照組和治療組兩組,每組49例;對照組患者給予常規急救治療,觀察組患者在常規治療的基礎上給予血液灌流聯閤血液透析採用血液灌流;對比兩組患者的臨床療效及併髮癥情況.結果 對照組35例治愈,14例死亡,治愈率為71.4%;治療組治愈46例,死亡3例,治愈率93.9%;觀察組治愈率明顯高于對照組對照組(x2=8.611,P<0.05);且觀察組的昏迷至清醒時間、平均住院時間、膽堿酯酶活力恢複時間及阿託品用量均較少于對照組(均P<0.01).對照組齣現尿潴留18例明顯多于觀察組的6例(x2=4.991,P<0.05);且對照組齣現中間綜閤徵、呼吸衰竭、遲髮型神經損害、反跳例數均多于對照組.結論 血液灌流聯閤血液透析用于重癥有機燐農藥中毒患者的搶救治療臨床療效好,且可顯著減少患者併髮癥的髮生,值得臨床推廣.
목적 탐토혈액관류연합혈액투석대중증유궤린농약중독환자적림상료효.방법 선취2005년3월지2013년9월래아원급진과취진적98례중도유궤린농약중독환자적림상자료,안조구치조시분위대조조화치료조량조,매조49례;대조조환자급여상규급구치료,관찰조환자재상규치료적기출상급여혈액관류연합혈액투석채용혈액관류;대비량조환자적림상료효급병발증정황.결과 대조조35례치유,14례사망,치유솔위71.4%;치료조치유46례,사망3례,치유솔93.9%;관찰조치유솔명현고우대조조대조조(x2=8.611,P<0.05);차관찰조적혼미지청성시간、평균주원시간、담감지매활력회복시간급아탁품용량균교소우대조조(균P<0.01).대조조출현뇨저류18례명현다우관찰조적6례(x2=4.991,P<0.05);차대조조출현중간종합정、호흡쇠갈、지발형신경손해、반도례수균다우대조조.결론 혈액관류연합혈액투석용우중증유궤린농약중독환자적창구치료림상료효호,차가현저감소환자병발증적발생,치득림상추엄.
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of hemoperfusion combined with hemodialysis in the treatment of severe organophosphate pesticide poisoning.Methods Ninety-eight patients with severe organophosphate pesticide poisoning who were admitted to the emergency department of our hospital from March 2005 to September 2013 were equally divided into control group and observation group according to treatment methods.The control group was given conventional emergency treatment,while the observation group was given hemoperfusion combined with hemodialysis and the conventional emergency treatment.The clinical outcomes and complications of two groups were compared.Results In the control group,35 patients were cured and 14 patients died,so the cure rate was 71.4%.In the treatment group,46 patients were cured and 3 patients died,so the cure rate was 93.9%.The treatment group had a significantly higher cure rate than the control group (x2=8.611,P<0.05).And the treatment group had significantly shorter duration of coma (P<0.01),mean length of hospital stay (P<0.01),and time to recovery of cholinesterase activity (P<0.01) and a significantly reduced dose of atropine than the control group (P<0.01).The control group had significantly more cases of urinary retention than the treatment group (18 vs.6,x2=4.991,P<0.05).And the control group had more cases of intermediate syndrome,respiratory failure,delayed neurological damage,and rebound than the treatment group.Conclusion Hemoperfusion combined hemodialysis has a good clinical effect and causes fewer complications in treating severe organophosphate pesticide poisoning,so it is worthy of clinical promotion.