中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2014年
42期
3323-3325
,共3页
汤小龙%张建伟%车旭%陈应泰%兰忠民%王成锋
湯小龍%張建偉%車旭%陳應泰%蘭忠民%王成鋒
탕소룡%장건위%차욱%진응태%란충민%왕성봉
上消化道%吻合口%出血%缝合技术
上消化道%吻閤口%齣血%縫閤技術
상소화도%문합구%출혈%봉합기술
Upper gastrointestinal tract%Anastomosis%Hemorrhage%Suturing techniques
目的 分析总结可吸收线连续锁边缝合法在胃空肠吻合术中的应用,探讨其临床价值.方法 统计分析2012年1月至2014年3月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院腹部外科单个治疗组采用可吸收线连续锁边缝合法的210例胃空肠吻合病例,对比同期300例采用传统全层间断缝合法的病例.观察术后吻合口相关并发症的发生概率,包括出血、吻合口漏、狭窄梗阻等.结果 两组均无手术死亡病例,吻合口连续锁边缝合组有1例发生吻合口出血(1/210,0.05%),全层间断缝合组发生吻合口出血17例(17/300,5.67%),差异有统计学意义(P =0.032).连续锁边缝合组术后吻合口漏、狭窄梗阻发生率低于全层间断缝合组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 采用可吸收线连续锁边缝合法较全层间断缝合法显著降低了胃空肠吻合口出血的发生率,同时其他吻合口相关并发症的发生率较低,是一种较为理想的胃空肠吻合口缝合加固方法.
目的 分析總結可吸收線連續鎖邊縫閤法在胃空腸吻閤術中的應用,探討其臨床價值.方法 統計分析2012年1月至2014年3月在中國醫學科學院腫瘤醫院腹部外科單箇治療組採用可吸收線連續鎖邊縫閤法的210例胃空腸吻閤病例,對比同期300例採用傳統全層間斷縫閤法的病例.觀察術後吻閤口相關併髮癥的髮生概率,包括齣血、吻閤口漏、狹窄梗阻等.結果 兩組均無手術死亡病例,吻閤口連續鎖邊縫閤組有1例髮生吻閤口齣血(1/210,0.05%),全層間斷縫閤組髮生吻閤口齣血17例(17/300,5.67%),差異有統計學意義(P =0.032).連續鎖邊縫閤組術後吻閤口漏、狹窄梗阻髮生率低于全層間斷縫閤組,但差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 採用可吸收線連續鎖邊縫閤法較全層間斷縫閤法顯著降低瞭胃空腸吻閤口齣血的髮生率,同時其他吻閤口相關併髮癥的髮生率較低,是一種較為理想的胃空腸吻閤口縫閤加固方法.
목적 분석총결가흡수선련속쇄변봉합법재위공장문합술중적응용,탐토기림상개치.방법 통계분석2012년1월지2014년3월재중국의학과학원종류의원복부외과단개치료조채용가흡수선련속쇄변봉합법적210례위공장문합병례,대비동기300례채용전통전층간단봉합법적병례.관찰술후문합구상관병발증적발생개솔,포괄출혈、문합구루、협착경조등.결과 량조균무수술사망병례,문합구련속쇄변봉합조유1례발생문합구출혈(1/210,0.05%),전층간단봉합조발생문합구출혈17례(17/300,5.67%),차이유통계학의의(P =0.032).련속쇄변봉합조술후문합구루、협착경조발생솔저우전층간단봉합조,단차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 채용가흡수선련속쇄변봉합법교전층간단봉합법현저강저료위공장문합구출혈적발생솔,동시기타문합구상관병발증적발생솔교저,시일충교위이상적위공장문합구봉합가고방법.
Objective To explore the application of absorbable suture continuous catcher (ASCC) method during gastrointestinal anastomosis.Methods From January 2012 to March 2014,210 patients with upper gastrointestinal tumors received ASCC method during gastrointestinal anastomosis by single treatment group.They were compared with 300 cases of full-thickness interrupted suture (FTIS) using traditional methods over the same period.Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed,including anastomotic hemorrhage,leakage and obstruction.Results There was neither mortality nor serious abdominal complication.The ASCC group had one case of anastomotic hemorrhage (1/210,0.05%) while there were 17 cases (17/300,5.67%) in the FTIS group.The difference was statistically significant with a P value of 0.032.The ASCC group had a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage and obstruction.However,the difference was statistically insignificant with P values of 0.101 and 0.153 respectively.Conclusion As compared with the FTIS method,the ASCC method has a lower incidence of gastrointestinal anastomotic hemorrhage and other anastomotic complications.The ASCC method is an ideal suture method of gastrointestinal anastomosis reinforcement.