中华医学科研管理杂志
中華醫學科研管理雜誌
중화의학과연관리잡지
ZHONGHUA YIXUE KEYAN GUANLI ZAZHI CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH MANAGEMENT
2014年
6期
630-635
,共6页
刘琳%霍墨霏%孙瑞华%王月香%张焕萍%王志江%樊凡
劉琳%霍墨霏%孫瑞華%王月香%張煥萍%王誌江%樊凡
류림%곽묵비%손서화%왕월향%장환평%왕지강%번범
科研项目%绩效评价%数据包络分析
科研項目%績效評價%數據包絡分析
과연항목%적효평개%수거포락분석
Data envelopment analysis%Performance measurement%Scientific and research project
目的 应用数据包络分析法(DEA)评价首都医学发展科研基金(简称首发基金)临床医学联合攻关项目绩效.方法 从课题“首都医学发展科研基金总体分析与评价”提取临床医学联合攻关项目相关数据.以发表论文、出版著作及本科统编教材、获得成果、专利、培养人才、新技术、后续承担课题绩效得分为产出指标,以拨款为投入指标,以项目为评价单元,运用数据包络分析法((Data envelopment analysis,DEA)、MaxDEA 5.2软件评价项目绩效.结果 立项项目回收率为77.70%,有效率100.00%.在7类产出绩效得分中,新技术类产出、获得成果、专利产出平均绩效得分较低.115个项目中15个项目无产出,7个项目DEA有效.11个项目技术有效,20个项目规模有效.76个项目非技术有效也非规模有效.结论 2005年、2007年立项项目投入较为适宜;部分项目存在投入偏大,部分项目培养人才、出版著作、后续承担课题、发表论文和获得成果方面产出不足,增加论文发表数量及培养人才数量是提高项目绩效的途径之一.
目的 應用數據包絡分析法(DEA)評價首都醫學髮展科研基金(簡稱首髮基金)臨床醫學聯閤攻關項目績效.方法 從課題“首都醫學髮展科研基金總體分析與評價”提取臨床醫學聯閤攻關項目相關數據.以髮錶論文、齣版著作及本科統編教材、穫得成果、專利、培養人纔、新技術、後續承擔課題績效得分為產齣指標,以撥款為投入指標,以項目為評價單元,運用數據包絡分析法((Data envelopment analysis,DEA)、MaxDEA 5.2軟件評價項目績效.結果 立項項目迴收率為77.70%,有效率100.00%.在7類產齣績效得分中,新技術類產齣、穫得成果、專利產齣平均績效得分較低.115箇項目中15箇項目無產齣,7箇項目DEA有效.11箇項目技術有效,20箇項目規模有效.76箇項目非技術有效也非規模有效.結論 2005年、2007年立項項目投入較為適宜;部分項目存在投入偏大,部分項目培養人纔、齣版著作、後續承擔課題、髮錶論文和穫得成果方麵產齣不足,增加論文髮錶數量及培養人纔數量是提高項目績效的途徑之一.
목적 응용수거포락분석법(DEA)평개수도의학발전과연기금(간칭수발기금)림상의학연합공관항목적효.방법 종과제“수도의학발전과연기금총체분석여평개”제취림상의학연합공관항목상관수거.이발표논문、출판저작급본과통편교재、획득성과、전리、배양인재、신기술、후속승담과제적효득분위산출지표,이발관위투입지표,이항목위평개단원,운용수거포락분석법((Data envelopment analysis,DEA)、MaxDEA 5.2연건평개항목적효.결과 립항항목회수솔위77.70%,유효솔100.00%.재7류산출적효득분중,신기술류산출、획득성과、전리산출평균적효득분교저.115개항목중15개항목무산출,7개항목DEA유효.11개항목기술유효,20개항목규모유효.76개항목비기술유효야비규모유효.결론 2005년、2007년립항항목투입교위괄의;부분항목존재투입편대,부분항목배양인재、출판저작、후속승담과제、발표논문화획득성과방면산출불족,증가논문발표수량급배양인재수량시제고항목적효적도경지일.
Objective To evaluate the performance of clinical medicine and joint research projects,funded by Capital Medical Research Fund.Method Data of clinical medicine and joint research projects were obtained from the project of "Data analysis and evaluation of Capital Medical Development Scientific Research Fund".Out puts include published papers,undergraduate textbooks,prize,patents,students' trainingsnew techniques and follow-up projects; Each project is considered as an evaluation unit,the grant amount as input indicator.Then Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA),software MaxDEA 5.2 were used to calculate the relative performance of these projects.Result The rate of recovery of questionnaire was 77.70%.Among 115projects,the average score of new technology,prize obtained and patent are less than other output indexes.15 projects have no output,7 projects reached the effectiveness of DEA.11 projects obtained the pure technology efficiency,20 projects obtained scale efficiency.Conclusion The funding for projects in 2005 and 2007 are within the appropriate amount,while funding for some projects are excessive; certain projects have less outputs in personnel trainings,publications,the follow-up projects,published papers and achievements.In order to improve project performance,the quantity of published papers and personnel trainings has to be increased.