中国实用医刊
中國實用醫刊
중국실용의간
CENTRAL PLAINS MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
3期
79-81
,共3页
通用型脊柱内固定系统治疗%腰椎滑脱%临床疗效
通用型脊柱內固定繫統治療%腰椎滑脫%臨床療效
통용형척주내고정계통치료%요추활탈%림상료효
General spine fixation system%Lumbar spondylolisthesis%Clinical efficacy
目的 探讨腰椎滑脱患者实施通用型脊柱内固定系统(GSS)治疗后的临床效果.方法 选取腰椎滑脱症患者110例.通过随机数表法将所有腰椎滑脱症患者分为D1组(观察组55例)与D2组(对照组55例).D1组选择GSS方法给予治疗;D2组选择保守方法治疗.对比两组患者治疗后临床效果的差异性.结果 两组患者完成治疗后,在治疗效果方面,D1组明显优于D2组(P<0.05).结论 针对腰椎滑脱患者,选择GSS方法的治疗效果更为确切,有较高的植骨融合率,具有安装方便、用时较短以及固定安全性较高等特点,具有较高的临床应用价值.
目的 探討腰椎滑脫患者實施通用型脊柱內固定繫統(GSS)治療後的臨床效果.方法 選取腰椎滑脫癥患者110例.通過隨機數錶法將所有腰椎滑脫癥患者分為D1組(觀察組55例)與D2組(對照組55例).D1組選擇GSS方法給予治療;D2組選擇保守方法治療.對比兩組患者治療後臨床效果的差異性.結果 兩組患者完成治療後,在治療效果方麵,D1組明顯優于D2組(P<0.05).結論 針對腰椎滑脫患者,選擇GSS方法的治療效果更為確切,有較高的植骨融閤率,具有安裝方便、用時較短以及固定安全性較高等特點,具有較高的臨床應用價值.
목적 탐토요추활탈환자실시통용형척주내고정계통(GSS)치료후적림상효과.방법 선취요추활탈증환자110례.통과수궤수표법장소유요추활탈증환자분위D1조(관찰조55례)여D2조(대조조55례).D1조선택GSS방법급여치료;D2조선택보수방법치료.대비량조환자치료후림상효과적차이성.결과 량조환자완성치료후,재치료효과방면,D1조명현우우D2조(P<0.05).결론 침대요추활탈환자,선택GSS방법적치료효과경위학절,유교고적식골융합솔,구유안장방편、용시교단이급고정안전성교고등특점,구유교고적림상응용개치.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of general spine fixation system (GSS) on the patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.Methods One hundred and ten patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were chose.All of spondylolisthesis patients were divided into D1 group (observation group,55 cases) and D2 group (control group,55 cases).The patients in D1 group were treated with GSS method; the patients in D2 Group were given conservative treatment.The treatment effects of the exhibit differences of the two groups were compared.Results The two groups patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis completed the treatment,in terms of therapeutic efficacy,D1 group were significantly better than the D2 group (P < 0.05).Conclusions For patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis,select the GSS method to treat,the treatment effect finally obtained more precise,the clinical manifestations with the higher fusion rate,effectively reflecting the ease of installation,use a shorter and fixed high security features,has the high clinical value.