中国实用医刊
中國實用醫刊
중국실용의간
CENTRAL PLAINS MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
3期
11-12
,共2页
恩必普%分水岭脑梗死%临床效果
恩必普%分水嶺腦梗死%臨床效果
은필보%분수령뇌경사%림상효과
Butylphthalide%Cerebral watershed infarction%Clinical effect
目的 探讨恩必普治疗分水岭脑梗死的临床效果.方法 选取分水岭脑梗死患者50例,随机分为两组,对照组25例,采用单纯的基础用药;实验组25例,在基础用药基础上加用恩必普胶囊.比较两组患者的MMSE评分、NIHSS评分及临床疗效.结果 治疗后,对照组MMSE评分为(19.24±4.19)分,实验组MMSE评分为(24.19±5.82)分,经统计学分析差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).对照组NIHSS评分为(8.15±2.24)分,实验组NIHSS评分为(4.31±1.45)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).实验组中7例痊愈,11例显效,4例好转,3例无效,总有效率为88％.对照组中4例痊愈,8例显效,6例好转,7例无效,总有效率为72％;经Ridit检验,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 恩必普治疗分水岭脑梗死临床效果较为显著,值得进一步推广和应用.
目的 探討恩必普治療分水嶺腦梗死的臨床效果.方法 選取分水嶺腦梗死患者50例,隨機分為兩組,對照組25例,採用單純的基礎用藥;實驗組25例,在基礎用藥基礎上加用恩必普膠囊.比較兩組患者的MMSE評分、NIHSS評分及臨床療效.結果 治療後,對照組MMSE評分為(19.24±4.19)分,實驗組MMSE評分為(24.19±5.82)分,經統計學分析差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05).對照組NIHSS評分為(8.15±2.24)分,實驗組NIHSS評分為(4.31±1.45)分,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05).實驗組中7例痊愈,11例顯效,4例好轉,3例無效,總有效率為88％.對照組中4例痊愈,8例顯效,6例好轉,7例無效,總有效率為72％;經Ridit檢驗,差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05).結論 恩必普治療分水嶺腦梗死臨床效果較為顯著,值得進一步推廣和應用.
목적 탐토은필보치료분수령뇌경사적림상효과.방법 선취분수령뇌경사환자50례,수궤분위량조,대조조25례,채용단순적기출용약;실험조25례,재기출용약기출상가용은필보효낭.비교량조환자적MMSE평분、NIHSS평분급림상료효.결과 치료후,대조조MMSE평분위(19.24±4.19)분,실험조MMSE평분위(24.19±5.82)분,경통계학분석차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).대조조NIHSS평분위(8.15±2.24)분,실험조NIHSS평분위(4.31±1.45)분,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).실험조중7례전유,11례현효,4례호전,3례무효,총유효솔위88％.대조조중4례전유,8례현효,6례호전,7례무효,총유효솔위72％;경Ridit검험,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).결론 은필보치료분수령뇌경사림상효과교위현저,치득진일보추엄화응용.
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of butylphthalide on cerebral watershed infarction.Methods Fifty patients with cerebral watershed infarction were randomly divided into two groups,control group with basic treatment,the experimental group were treated with butylphthalide capsules in the basic treatment.The MMSE score,NIHSS score and the clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups.Results After treatment,MMSE in the control group was 19.24 ± 4.19,in experimental group was 24.19 ± 5.82,there was statistically significant difference(P ＜ 0.05).After treatment,NIHSS in the control group was 8.15 ± 2.24,NIHSS in experimental group was 4.31 ± 1.45,there was statistically significant difference (P ＜ 0.05).In experimental group,7 cases were cured,11 cases were markedly effective,4 cases were improved,and 3 cases were ineffective.The total effective rate was 88％.In control group,4 cases were cured,8 cases were cured,6 cases improved,7 cases ineffective,the total effective rate was 72％.By Ridit test,there was statistically significant difference (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions The clinical effect of butylphthalide on cerebral watershed infarction in general is more significant,so is worthy of further promotion and application.
