CAJ | 학술논문

目的了解中国儿童道路交通伤害门/急诊病例变化趋势及现况特征,为制定相关干预措施和政策提供依据.方法利用2006-2013年全国伤害监测系统(NISS)数据,分析儿童道路交通伤害病例变化趋势及人口学、伤害事件和临床等现况特征.结果 2006-2013年NISS儿童道路交通伤害病例数量呈上升趋势,一直居儿童非故意伤害发生原因的第二位,但占儿童非故意伤害病例总数的比例呈下降趋势.2013年儿童道路交通伤害男女性别比值为1.82,17岁年龄段占10.86％;机动车车祸病例占66.44％,7、8月、周末和17:00-18:00时为高发期,65.42％的伤害是发生在驾乘交通工具时;伤害性质73.53％为挫伤/朦伤,伤害部位33.81％为头部,轻病例占76.42％,伤者74.86％的就医结局为治疗后回家.结论儿童道路交通伤害问题不容忽视,中学高年级男生和学龄前男童是儿童道路交通伤害干预的重点人群,应针对不同年龄和性别儿童开展道路交通安全教育.
목적 료해중국인동도로교통상해문/급진병례변화추세급현황특정,위제정상관간예조시화정책제공의거.방법 이용2006-2013년전국상해감측계통(NISS)수거,분석인동도로교통상해병례변화추세급인구학、상해사건화림상등현황특정.결과 2006-2013년NISS인동도로교통상해병례수량정상승추세,일직거인동비고의상해발생원인적제이위,단점인동비고의상해병례총수적비례정하강추세.2013년인동도로교통상해남녀성별비치위1.82,17세년령단점10.86％;궤동차차화병례점66.44％,7、8월、주말화17:00-18:00시위고발기,65.42％적상해시발생재가승교통공구시;상해성질73.53％위좌상/몽상,상해부위33.81％위두부,경병례점76.42％,상자74.86％적취의결국위치료후회가.결론 인동도로교통상해문제불용홀시,중학고년급남생화학령전남동시인동도로교통상해간예적중점인군,응침대불동년령화성별인동개전도로교통안전교육.
Objective To understand the trend and current characteristics of children engaged in road traffic injury.Data was fiom the Nation Injury Surveillance System (NISS) and the results of the study would provide basis for corresponding intervention strategies and decision-making.Methods Descriptive analysis was applied to display the trend of child road traffic injury from 2006 and 2013 and also to depict the general information,injuries event and clinical characteristics of child road traffic injuries in 2013.Results The number of child road traffic injuries increased from 2006 to 2013 and ranking the second cause of child unintentional injuries during these years.However,the proportion of child road traffic injuries among child unintentional injuries decreased in the same period.In 2013,sex ratio appeared as 1.82,with 17-year-old age group accounting for 10.86％.Injuries caused by motor traffic vehicles accounted for 66.44％,with July/August,weekends and 17-18 PM as the peak period or time.Transportation related injuries accounted for 65.42％,with 73.53％ as bruise.33.81％ of the injury involved in the head but 76.42％ of injuries were minor,while 74.86％ went home after the treatment.Conclusion Child road traffic injury should not be ignored.Age and sex differences should be taken into account when carrying out education programs on child road traffic safety.Male students at senior high school or preschool were target groups when carrying out child road traffic injury intervention programs.