中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2014年
10期
1033-1035
,共3页
临床护理路径%教学法%支原体肺炎
臨床護理路徑%教學法%支原體肺炎
림상호리로경%교학법%지원체폐염
Clinical nursing path%Teaching method%Mycoplasma pneumonia
目的 探讨临床护理路径在小儿支原体肺炎中的应用及其效果.方法 选择我院2011级高职护理专业2个班学生93人为研究对象,一个班46人设为实验组,另一个班47人设为对照组.对照组采用传统教学,实验组采用临床护理路径教学.教学结束后,对两组护生进行闭卷考试和问卷调查以评价教学效果.采用SPSS 13.0软件进行统计分析,计数资料采用x2检验,计量资料采用t检验,检验水准α=0.05.结果 实验组护生理论考试成绩(85.26±3.57)分明显高于对照组(76.39±4.16)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.02).问卷调查显示,实验组学生对问卷项目中有助于提高学习自主性、有助于提高评判性思维能力、促进对疾病内容的掌握作出肯定评价的人数多于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 应用临床护理路径可提高教学效果.
目的 探討臨床護理路徑在小兒支原體肺炎中的應用及其效果.方法 選擇我院2011級高職護理專業2箇班學生93人為研究對象,一箇班46人設為實驗組,另一箇班47人設為對照組.對照組採用傳統教學,實驗組採用臨床護理路徑教學.教學結束後,對兩組護生進行閉捲攷試和問捲調查以評價教學效果.採用SPSS 13.0軟件進行統計分析,計數資料採用x2檢驗,計量資料採用t檢驗,檢驗水準α=0.05.結果 實驗組護生理論攷試成績(85.26±3.57)分明顯高于對照組(76.39±4.16)分,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P=0.02).問捲調查顯示,實驗組學生對問捲項目中有助于提高學習自主性、有助于提高評判性思維能力、促進對疾病內容的掌握作齣肯定評價的人數多于對照組,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05).結論 應用臨床護理路徑可提高教學效果.
목적 탐토림상호리로경재소인지원체폐염중적응용급기효과.방법 선택아원2011급고직호리전업2개반학생93인위연구대상,일개반46인설위실험조,령일개반47인설위대조조.대조조채용전통교학,실험조채용림상호리로경교학.교학결속후,대량조호생진행폐권고시화문권조사이평개교학효과.채용SPSS 13.0연건진행통계분석,계수자료채용x2검험,계량자료채용t검험,검험수준α=0.05.결과 실험조호생이론고시성적(85.26±3.57)분명현고우대조조(76.39±4.16)분,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P=0.02).문권조사현시,실험조학생대문권항목중유조우제고학습자주성、유조우제고평판성사유능력、촉진대질병내용적장악작출긍정평개적인수다우대조조,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).결론 응용림상호리로경가제고교학효과.
Objective To explore the clinical nursing path teaching method application in children with mycoplasma pneumonia and its effect.Methods 93 higher vocational nursing students of two classes of Grade 2011 were chosen as the subjects,one class as the experimental group(46),and the other class as the control group(47).The traditional teaching method was used in the control group,while method of clinical nursing path was used in the experimental group.Two groups of nursing students were given closed book exams and questionnaires to evaluate teaching effectiveness of the two groups.SPSS 13.0 was used for statistical analysis,count data using x2 test,measurement data using t-test,test level α=0.05.Results The experimental group students' test scores were significantly higher than the control group(85.26 ± 3.57)vs.(76.39 ± 4.16),and the difference was statistically significant P=-0.02.The survey showed that there were more students in the experimental group than in the control group who made a positive comment on the questionnaire's role in helping improve students'learning autonomy,their critical thinking ability,and promote their grasp of the content of the disease.Conclusion Clinical nursing path teaching method as a new kind of teaching method,can improve the teaching effect.
