CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨失能老人主要照顾者心理弹性与应对方式的现状及其相关性,为进一步的干预性研究提供科学依据.方法应用自行设计的一般情况调查表、ADLs、CD-RISC中文版和简易应对方式问卷,对广州市部分社区117名失能老人主要照顾者进行调查,并对调查结果进行分析.结果本次调查的失能老人主要照顾者心理弹性得分为(58.97±17.09)分,较常模低,处于中等水平;与其积极应对方式呈显著正相关,与其消极应对方式无显著的相关性;其积极应对方式和消极应对方式是其心理弹性的影响因素,可以解释照顾者心理弹性总变异的16.6％.结论失能老人主要照顾者的心理弹性水平较低,护士在临床工作中应根据照顾者不同的弹性水平给予不同的干预.
목적 탐토실능노인주요조고자심리탄성여응대방식적현상급기상관성,위진일보적간예성연구제공과학의거.방법 응용자행설계적일반정황조사표、ADLs、CD-RISC중문판화간역응대방식문권,대엄주시부분사구117명실능노인주요조고자진행조사,병대조사결과진행분석.결과 본차조사적실능노인주요조고자심리탄성득분위(58.97±17.09)분,교상모저,처우중등수평;여기적겁응대방식정현저정상관,여기소겁응대방식무현저적상관성;기적겁응대방식화소겁응대방식시기심리탄성적영향인소,가이해석조고자심리탄성총변이적16.6％.결론 실능노인주요조고자적심리탄성수평교저,호사재림상공작중응근거조고자불동적탄성수평급여불동적간예.
Objective To investigate and analyze the status and relation between resilience and coping style of disabled elderly caregivers,and to provide evidence for further intervention studies.Methods Totally 117 caregivers in several communities were investigated with self-designed general questionnaire,Activity of Daily Living Scale (ADL),Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) Chinese version and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ).The results underwent analysis.Results Disabled elderly caregivers' resilience score was (58.97±17.09),which was at a medium level and lower than normal population.Its active coping style was significantly positively correlated with resilience,while its negative coping style was not correlated with resilience.Positive and negative coping style influenced caregivers' resilience and could be a total explanation to caregivers' resilience of 16.6％ of the total variance.Conclusions Disabled elderly caregivers' resilience was at a lower level,and nurses should be given different interventions based on different caregivers' resilience levels at clinical work.