中华口腔医学杂志
中華口腔醫學雜誌
중화구강의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2015年
2期
78-83
,共6页
刘伟涛%宋扬%王雪东%何丹青%周彦恒
劉偉濤%宋颺%王雪東%何丹青%週彥恆
류위도%송양%왕설동%하단청%주언항
腭扩张术%口外牵引器%锥束计算机体层摄影术
腭擴張術%口外牽引器%錐束計算機體層攝影術
악확장술%구외견인기%추속계산궤체층섭영술
Palatal expansion technique%Extraoral traction appliances%Cone-beam computed tomography
目的 使用锥形束CT比较上颌单次快速扩弓前方牵引和上颌反复快速扩缩前方牵引的矫治效果,以期为临床提供参考.方法 选择24例上颌后缩患者,使用随机化区组设计的方法分为对照组和反复扩缩组,每组12例.对照组上颌单次快速扩弓后行面罩前方牵引;反复扩缩组上颌反复快速扩缩后行面罩前方牵引.对每组治疗前后的锥形束CT影像进行三维重建、定点、重叠和测量分析.结果 反复扩缩组1例患者在治疗中失访.治疗后反复扩缩组上颌骨前移量[(2.5±1.0)mm]显著大于对照组[(1.6±0.8)mm](P<0.05);反复扩缩组颅底点至上齿槽座点(Ba-A)的距离增加了(3.1±1.0) mm,显著大于对照组[(2.2±0.9)mm](P<0.05);反复扩缩组上颌双侧第一磨牙前移量显著大于对照组(P<0.05).结论 与上颌单次快速扩弓相比,上颌反复快速扩缩前方牵引早期治疗上颌后缩患者可能对上颌骨前移略有利.
目的 使用錐形束CT比較上頜單次快速擴弓前方牽引和上頜反複快速擴縮前方牽引的矯治效果,以期為臨床提供參攷.方法 選擇24例上頜後縮患者,使用隨機化區組設計的方法分為對照組和反複擴縮組,每組12例.對照組上頜單次快速擴弓後行麵罩前方牽引;反複擴縮組上頜反複快速擴縮後行麵罩前方牽引.對每組治療前後的錐形束CT影像進行三維重建、定點、重疊和測量分析.結果 反複擴縮組1例患者在治療中失訪.治療後反複擴縮組上頜骨前移量[(2.5±1.0)mm]顯著大于對照組[(1.6±0.8)mm](P<0.05);反複擴縮組顱底點至上齒槽座點(Ba-A)的距離增加瞭(3.1±1.0) mm,顯著大于對照組[(2.2±0.9)mm](P<0.05);反複擴縮組上頜雙側第一磨牙前移量顯著大于對照組(P<0.05).結論 與上頜單次快速擴弓相比,上頜反複快速擴縮前方牽引早期治療上頜後縮患者可能對上頜骨前移略有利.
목적 사용추형속CT비교상합단차쾌속확궁전방견인화상합반복쾌속확축전방견인적교치효과,이기위림상제공삼고.방법 선택24례상합후축환자,사용수궤화구조설계적방법분위대조조화반복확축조,매조12례.대조조상합단차쾌속확궁후행면조전방견인;반복확축조상합반복쾌속확축후행면조전방견인.대매조치료전후적추형속CT영상진행삼유중건、정점、중첩화측량분석.결과 반복확축조1례환자재치료중실방.치료후반복확축조상합골전이량[(2.5±1.0)mm]현저대우대조조[(1.6±0.8)mm](P<0.05);반복확축조로저점지상치조좌점(Ba-A)적거리증가료(3.1±1.0) mm,현저대우대조조[(2.2±0.9)mm](P<0.05);반복확축조상합쌍측제일마아전이량현저대우대조조(P<0.05).결론 여상합단차쾌속확궁상비,상합반복쾌속확축전방견인조기치료상합후축환자가능대상합골전이략유리.
Objective To investigate the effects of maxillary protraction combined with repetitive rapid palatal expansions and constrictions(RPE/C) vs.rapid palatal expansion(RPE) alone using cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT).Methods Twenty four subjects with maxillary retrusion were recruited and block randomized into either the control group(n=12) or the RPE/C(n=12) group.Control group:facemask protraction after RPE.RPE/C group:facemask protraction after RPE/C.3D reconstruction,landmarks identifying,superimposition and cephalometric analysis were performed to compare the pre-treatment and post-treatment CBCT images.Results One subject in the RPE/C group was lost to follow up during the treatment.Maxilla moved forward[(2.5 ± 1.0) mm] after maxillary protraction with RPE/C,which was significantly greater than that in the control group[(1.6±0.8) mm](P<0.05).The distance of basion to subspinale (Ba-A) increased[(3.1 ± 1.0) mm] in the RPE/C group,which was significantly greater than that in the control group[(2.2 ± 0.9) mm] (P<0.05).The amount of forward movement of upper first molars was significantly greater in the RPE/C group(P<0.05).Conclusions Maxillary protraction with RPE/C might positively affect the forward movement of maxilla compared with the RPE alone protocol with the early treatment of maxillary retrusion patients.