中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志
中華眼視光學與視覺科學雜誌
중화안시광학여시각과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY OPHTHALMOLOGY AND VISUAL SCIENCE
2015年
1期
53-56
,共4页
傅涛%郗平%王京辉%苏庆%李育%卢炜
傅濤%郗平%王京輝%囌慶%李育%盧煒
부도%치평%왕경휘%소경%리육%로위
融合性辐辏运动%融合性分开运动%同视机%三棱镜排镜
融閤性輻輳運動%融閤性分開運動%同視機%三稜鏡排鏡
융합성복주운동%융합성분개운동%동시궤%삼릉경배경
Fusional convergence%Fusional divergence%Synoptophore%Prism bar
目的 对比三棱镜排镜法和同视机法对正常儿童的融合性辐辏和融合性分开运动检查的异同.方法 横断面研究.收集8～15岁无眼部疾患并且进行充分屈光矫正的儿童100例,分别采用同视机和三棱镜排镜法测量融合性分开运动和融合性辐辏运动的破裂点和恢复点.各种检查均重复3次,取平均值,采用独立样本t检验对比2种方法测量结果的异同,相关性分析采用Spearman相关分析.结果 当三棱镜排镜分别放置在主导眼和非主导眼时,融合性辐辏运动和融合性分开运动看远和看近时的破裂点和恢复点差异均无统计学意义.同视机和三棱镜排镜检测融合性辐辏和分开运动的破裂点数据呈正相关(辐辏运动r=0.60,P＜0.01,分开运动r=0.46,P＜0.05) 视远时,无论融合性辐辏还是融合性分开运动,分别采用同视机和三棱镜排镜检查的破裂点和恢复点的差异均无统计学意义.结论 三棱镜排镜法在检测正常儿童看远的融合性辐辏与分开运动时与同视机法可获得相近的效果.
目的 對比三稜鏡排鏡法和同視機法對正常兒童的融閤性輻輳和融閤性分開運動檢查的異同.方法 橫斷麵研究.收集8～15歲無眼部疾患併且進行充分屈光矯正的兒童100例,分彆採用同視機和三稜鏡排鏡法測量融閤性分開運動和融閤性輻輳運動的破裂點和恢複點.各種檢查均重複3次,取平均值,採用獨立樣本t檢驗對比2種方法測量結果的異同,相關性分析採用Spearman相關分析.結果 噹三稜鏡排鏡分彆放置在主導眼和非主導眼時,融閤性輻輳運動和融閤性分開運動看遠和看近時的破裂點和恢複點差異均無統計學意義.同視機和三稜鏡排鏡檢測融閤性輻輳和分開運動的破裂點數據呈正相關(輻輳運動r=0.60,P＜0.01,分開運動r=0.46,P＜0.05) 視遠時,無論融閤性輻輳還是融閤性分開運動,分彆採用同視機和三稜鏡排鏡檢查的破裂點和恢複點的差異均無統計學意義.結論 三稜鏡排鏡法在檢測正常兒童看遠的融閤性輻輳與分開運動時與同視機法可穫得相近的效果.
목적 대비삼릉경배경법화동시궤법대정상인동적융합성복주화융합성분개운동검사적이동.방법 횡단면연구.수집8～15세무안부질환병차진행충분굴광교정적인동100례,분별채용동시궤화삼릉경배경법측량융합성분개운동화융합성복주운동적파렬점화회복점.각충검사균중복3차,취평균치,채용독립양본t검험대비2충방법측량결과적이동,상관성분석채용Spearman상관분석.결과 당삼릉경배경분별방치재주도안화비주도안시,융합성복주운동화융합성분개운동간원화간근시적파렬점화회복점차이균무통계학의의.동시궤화삼릉경배경검측융합성복주화분개운동적파렬점수거정정상관(복주운동r=0.60,P＜0.01,분개운동r=0.46,P＜0.05) 시원시,무론융합성복주환시융합성분개운동,분별채용동시궤화삼릉경배경검사적파렬점화회복점적차이균무통계학의의.결론 삼릉경배경법재검측정상인동간원적융합성복주여분개운동시여동시궤법가획득상근적효과.
Objective To evaluate differences between the prism bar and synoptophore methods in the measurement of fusional convergence and fusional divergence in normal children.Methods This was a prospective research study.Children aged 8 to 15 years who had no ocular disease were recruited and tested with their prescribed refractions.The break and recovery points of fusional convergence and fusional divergence were measured by the prism bar and synoptophore methods respectively.Each test was repeated 3 times.An independent samples t-test was used to compare the difference between the 2 methods.Correlation between the two methods was analyzed by a Spearman rank correlation.Results There were no differences in break and recovery points of fusional vergences between dominant eye and non-dominant eye.There were positive correlations between break point values measured by the synoptophore and prism bar (convergence r=0.60,P＜0.01; divergence r=0.46,P＜0.05).When measured by the prism bar and synoptophore respectively,no significant differences could be found for either the values of the break points or that of recovery points of the 2 methods.Conclusion When measuring the distance fusional vergences,prism bar and synoptophore with similar effect.
