中国药师
中國藥師
중국약사
CHINA PHARMACIST
2015年
2期
260-261,262
,共3页
朱思强%谢晋%郑海华%陈书文
硃思彊%謝晉%鄭海華%陳書文
주사강%사진%정해화%진서문
眼部带状疱疹%更昔洛韦%板蓝根颗粒%针灸
眼部帶狀皰疹%更昔洛韋%闆藍根顆粒%針灸
안부대상포진%경석락위%판람근과립%침구
Ocular herpes zoster%Ganciclovir%Banlangen granules%Acupuncture
目的::观察中西医结合治疗眼部带状疱疹的临床疗效。方法:70例眼部带状疱疹患者按就诊时间先后顺序编号,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组。对照组采用更昔洛韦5.0 mg·kg-1·h-1,ivd qd+外用更昔洛韦眼用凝胶,qid。观察组在对照组基础上加用板蓝根颗粒与针灸治疗。观察和比较两组治疗效果、止疱时间、止痛时间、结痂时间和药品不良反应。结果:治疗后,观察组有效率94.29%,明显高于对照组的77.14%(P<0.05),观察组患者止疱时间、止痛时间及结痂时间也明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:眼部带状疱疹患者采用中西医结合治疗的临床疗效明显优于单独采用西药治疗,不良反应少,止痛、止疱、结痂快。
目的::觀察中西醫結閤治療眼部帶狀皰疹的臨床療效。方法:70例眼部帶狀皰疹患者按就診時間先後順序編號,採用隨機數字錶法分為對照組和觀察組。對照組採用更昔洛韋5.0 mg·kg-1·h-1,ivd qd+外用更昔洛韋眼用凝膠,qid。觀察組在對照組基礎上加用闆藍根顆粒與針灸治療。觀察和比較兩組治療效果、止皰時間、止痛時間、結痂時間和藥品不良反應。結果:治療後,觀察組有效率94.29%,明顯高于對照組的77.14%(P<0.05),觀察組患者止皰時間、止痛時間及結痂時間也明顯短于對照組(P<0.05)。兩組不良反應髮生率比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論:眼部帶狀皰疹患者採用中西醫結閤治療的臨床療效明顯優于單獨採用西藥治療,不良反應少,止痛、止皰、結痂快。
목적::관찰중서의결합치료안부대상포진적림상료효。방법:70례안부대상포진환자안취진시간선후순서편호,채용수궤수자표법분위대조조화관찰조。대조조채용경석락위5.0 mg·kg-1·h-1,ivd qd+외용경석락위안용응효,qid。관찰조재대조조기출상가용판람근과립여침구치료。관찰화비교량조치료효과、지포시간、지통시간、결가시간화약품불량반응。결과:치료후,관찰조유효솔94.29%,명현고우대조조적77.14%(P<0.05),관찰조환자지포시간、지통시간급결가시간야명현단우대조조(P<0.05)。량조불량반응발생솔비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론:안부대상포진환자채용중서의결합치료적림상료효명현우우단독채용서약치료,불량반응소,지통、지포、결가쾌。
Objective:To observe the clinical curative effect of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in the treat-ment of patients with ocular herpes zoster. Methods:Seventy patients with ocular herpes zoster in our hospital were selected during De-cember 2011 to December 2013. According to random number table,the patients were divided into two groups. The patients in the con-trol group were treated with ganciclovir 5. 0 mg·kg-1 ·h-1 , ivd, qd and ganciclovir ophthalmic gel, qid. The patients in the observa-tion group were treated with Banlangen granules and acupuncture additionally. The clinical efficacy, the time of blistering, pain and crusting and adverse reactions in the two groups were observed and compared. Results:After the treatment, the effective rate of the ob-servation group was 94. 29% , while that of the control group was 77. 14% (P<0. 05). The time of blistering, pain and crusting in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P<0. 05). The incidence of adverse reactions of the ob-servation group was 2. 86%, while that of the control group was 11. 43%(P>0. 05). Conclusion:The clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in the treatment of ocular herpes zoster is obviously better than that of western medicine treat-ment alone with fewer adverse reactions and shorter time of blistering, pain and crusting.