中华内分泌代谢杂志
中華內分泌代謝雜誌
중화내분비대사잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
2015年
2期
136-139
,共4页
李红星%郭淑芹%马锐%王淑梅%张建军%李瑞雪%杨茜
李紅星%郭淑芹%馬銳%王淑梅%張建軍%李瑞雪%楊茜
리홍성%곽숙근%마예%왕숙매%장건군%리서설%양천
腹高%内脏脂肪%腰围%体重指数%腰围身高比值
腹高%內髒脂肪%腰圍%體重指數%腰圍身高比值
복고%내장지방%요위%체중지수%요위신고비치
Abdominal height%Visceral fat%Waist circumference%Body mass index%Waist-to-height ratio
177人行腹部 CT 扫描的体检者(男性87人,女性90人)进行腹高、腰围、体重指数和腰围身高比值的测量。比较腹高等体表测量指标与内脏脂肪的相关性。分性别应用受试者特征工作(ROC)曲线,以腰椎4~5层面冠状位的内脏脂肪面积≥80 cm2为切点,约登指数确定各指标在腹型肥胖的切点值。男性腹型肥胖的比例为80.5%,女性为65.6%;校正了年龄因素,与其他的体表测量指标相比,腹高与内脏脂肪有高度相关性,Pearson 相关系数分别为0.825和0.732,预测腹型肥胖的切点在男性和女性分别为20 cm 和20.3 cm,曲线下面积分别是0.914和0.892。腹高和腰围身高比值在预测腹型肥胖上优于腰围和体重指数。腰围、体重指数和腰围身高比值的最佳切点是:男性91 cm、25 kg/ m2和0.52;女性86.5 cm、25 kg/ m2和0.54。腹高能够有效预测腹型肥胖,20 cm 可作为腹型肥胖的切点。
177人行腹部 CT 掃描的體檢者(男性87人,女性90人)進行腹高、腰圍、體重指數和腰圍身高比值的測量。比較腹高等體錶測量指標與內髒脂肪的相關性。分性彆應用受試者特徵工作(ROC)麯線,以腰椎4~5層麵冠狀位的內髒脂肪麵積≥80 cm2為切點,約登指數確定各指標在腹型肥胖的切點值。男性腹型肥胖的比例為80.5%,女性為65.6%;校正瞭年齡因素,與其他的體錶測量指標相比,腹高與內髒脂肪有高度相關性,Pearson 相關繫數分彆為0.825和0.732,預測腹型肥胖的切點在男性和女性分彆為20 cm 和20.3 cm,麯線下麵積分彆是0.914和0.892。腹高和腰圍身高比值在預測腹型肥胖上優于腰圍和體重指數。腰圍、體重指數和腰圍身高比值的最佳切點是:男性91 cm、25 kg/ m2和0.52;女性86.5 cm、25 kg/ m2和0.54。腹高能夠有效預測腹型肥胖,20 cm 可作為腹型肥胖的切點。
177인행복부 CT 소묘적체검자(남성87인,녀성90인)진행복고、요위、체중지수화요위신고비치적측량。비교복고등체표측량지표여내장지방적상관성。분성별응용수시자특정공작(ROC)곡선,이요추4~5층면관상위적내장지방면적≥80 cm2위절점,약등지수학정각지표재복형비반적절점치。남성복형비반적비례위80.5%,녀성위65.6%;교정료년령인소,여기타적체표측량지표상비,복고여내장지방유고도상관성,Pearson 상관계수분별위0.825화0.732,예측복형비반적절점재남성화녀성분별위20 cm 화20.3 cm,곡선하면적분별시0.914화0.892。복고화요위신고비치재예측복형비반상우우요위화체중지수。요위、체중지수화요위신고비치적최가절점시:남성91 cm、25 kg/ m2화0.52;녀성86.5 cm、25 kg/ m2화0.54。복고능구유효예측복형비반,20 cm 가작위복형비반적절점。
Totally 177 individuals (87 males and 90 females), who took abdominal computer tomography were enrolled. Anthropometric surrogates such as abdominal height( AH), waist circumference( WC), body mass index(BMI), and waist to height ratio(WHtR) were measured. Correlations between AH, WC, BMI, and WHtR with visceral abdominal fat were analyzed, and receiver operating characteristic curves ( ROC) were prepared for detecting abdominal adiposity at or beyond 80cm2 using lumbar vertebra 4-5 cross-section visceral fat areas as the screening cut-point within gender separately. Youden′s index was used to determine cut-off values of AH, WC, BMI, and WHtR by which to classify excess abdominal fat. 70(80. 5% ) males and 59(65. 9% ) females had abdominal obesity. Compared to other anthropometic indicators, AH presented the highest correlation with visceral adipose fat. The pearson correlation efficiencies were 0. 825 and 0. 732, the cut-off points were 20 cm and 20. 3 cm in male and female respectively. After controlling for age, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that AH, followed by WHtR, outperformed WC and BMI in identifying central obesity participants. Optimal cut-off values of the physical anthropometric indices to indentify abdominal adiposity were 20 cm(AH), and 91 cm(WC) 25 kg/ m2 (BMI), and 0. 52(WHtR) for men, and 20. 3 cm(AH), 86. 5 cm(WC), 25 kg/ m2(BMI), and 0. 54(WHtR) for women. AH is effective for predicting visceral adiposity and might be considered the best predictor of abdominal obesity at a cut-point of 20cm in Chinese adults.