白求恩医学杂志
白求恩醫學雜誌
백구은의학잡지
Journal of Bethune Military Medical College
2015年
1期
10-12
,共3页
子宫内膜异位症%不孕%体外受精-胚胎移植%妊娠
子宮內膜異位癥%不孕%體外受精-胚胎移植%妊娠
자궁내막이위증%불잉%체외수정-배태이식%임신
Endometriosis%Infertility%In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer%Pregnancy
目的:分析子宫内膜异位症不孕患者行体外受精-胚胎移植( IVF-ET )治疗的临床效果。方法回顾性分析98例子宫内膜异位症不孕患者行IVF-ET治疗(观察组)与98例单纯输卵管因素不孕患者行IVF-ET治疗(对照组)后的妊娠结局。结果两组患者移植日子宫内膜厚度、卵裂率、流产率比较,差异均无统计学意义( P >0.05);观察组人促性腺激素(Gn)用量高于对照组( P <0.01),获卵数、受精率、妊娠率均低于对照组( P <0.05或P <0.01)。结论子宫内膜异位症不孕患者行IVF-ET治疗其获卵数、受精率及妊娠率明显不及单纯输卵管因素致不孕行IVF-ET治疗者,但对不孕患者仍然不失为一种有效的治疗手段。
目的:分析子宮內膜異位癥不孕患者行體外受精-胚胎移植( IVF-ET )治療的臨床效果。方法迴顧性分析98例子宮內膜異位癥不孕患者行IVF-ET治療(觀察組)與98例單純輸卵管因素不孕患者行IVF-ET治療(對照組)後的妊娠結跼。結果兩組患者移植日子宮內膜厚度、卵裂率、流產率比較,差異均無統計學意義( P >0.05);觀察組人促性腺激素(Gn)用量高于對照組( P <0.01),穫卵數、受精率、妊娠率均低于對照組( P <0.05或P <0.01)。結論子宮內膜異位癥不孕患者行IVF-ET治療其穫卵數、受精率及妊娠率明顯不及單純輸卵管因素緻不孕行IVF-ET治療者,但對不孕患者仍然不失為一種有效的治療手段。
목적:분석자궁내막이위증불잉환자행체외수정-배태이식( IVF-ET )치료적림상효과。방법회고성분석98례자궁내막이위증불잉환자행IVF-ET치료(관찰조)여98례단순수란관인소불잉환자행IVF-ET치료(대조조)후적임신결국。결과량조환자이식일자궁내막후도、란렬솔、유산솔비교,차이균무통계학의의( P >0.05);관찰조인촉성선격소(Gn)용량고우대조조( P <0.01),획란수、수정솔、임신솔균저우대조조( P <0.05혹P <0.01)。결론자궁내막이위증불잉환자행IVF-ET치료기획란수、수정솔급임신솔명현불급단순수란관인소치불잉행IVF-ET치료자,단대불잉환자잉연불실위일충유효적치료수단。
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of infertile patients with endometriosis treated in vitro with fertilization and embryo transfer ( IVF-ET) .Methods A retrospective analysis of 98 patients undergoing endometriosis ( endometriosis ) IVF-ET treatment (observation group) and 98 cases of simple tubal factor undergoing IVF-ET therapy (control group) were made.Results The two groups of patients had no significant difference ( P >0.05) in the transplantation of endometrium ,cleavage rate,abortion rate and content of Gn of endometriosis group was higher than that of control group ( P <0.01) and number of retrieved oocytes ,fertiliza-tion rate and pregnancy rate were lower than those of control group ( P <0.05 or P <0.01).Conclusion The number of retrieved o-ocytes,fertilization rate and pregnancy rate in infertile patients with endometriosis undergoing IVF -ET are obviously lower than those of the infertility patients with simple tubal factor undergoing IVF-ET,but is still an effective treatment of infertility patients .