承德医学院学报
承德醫學院學報
승덕의학원학보
JOURNAL OF CHENGDE MEDICAL
2015年
1期
23-24
,共2页
王平%陈喜波%李汝泓%李艳%杨玲
王平%陳喜波%李汝泓%李豔%楊玲
왕평%진희파%리여홍%리염%양령
氢吗啡酮%芬太尼%颌面部手术
氫嗎啡酮%芬太尼%頜麵部手術
경마배동%분태니%합면부수술
Hydromorphone%Fentanyl%Maxillofacial surgery
目的::评价氢吗啡酮联合芬太尼用于颌面部手术患者术后自控静脉镇痛的效果。方法:40例择期行颌面部手术的患者随机分为氢吗啡酮+芬太尼(H)组和芬太尼(F)组,每组20例。两组术后均采用患者静脉自控镇痛的方式,F组芬太尼1.0mg;H组氢吗啡酮1.6mg+芬太尼0.5mg,记录术后2h、4h、8h、12h、24h的疼痛评分(VAS评分)和Ramsay镇静评分(RSS评分),观察恶心、呕吐、眩晕等不良反应的发生情况。结果:两组患者术后各时间点VAS评分、RSS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。镇痛治疗期间H组患者恶心呕吐、眩晕的发生率明显低于F组(P<0.05)。结论:氢吗啡酮联合芬太尼与单用芬太尼用于颌面部手术术后镇痛的效果相当,但不良反应发生率明显较低,更适用于颌面部手术术后镇痛。
目的::評價氫嗎啡酮聯閤芬太尼用于頜麵部手術患者術後自控靜脈鎮痛的效果。方法:40例擇期行頜麵部手術的患者隨機分為氫嗎啡酮+芬太尼(H)組和芬太尼(F)組,每組20例。兩組術後均採用患者靜脈自控鎮痛的方式,F組芬太尼1.0mg;H組氫嗎啡酮1.6mg+芬太尼0.5mg,記錄術後2h、4h、8h、12h、24h的疼痛評分(VAS評分)和Ramsay鎮靜評分(RSS評分),觀察噁心、嘔吐、眩暈等不良反應的髮生情況。結果:兩組患者術後各時間點VAS評分、RSS評分比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。鎮痛治療期間H組患者噁心嘔吐、眩暈的髮生率明顯低于F組(P<0.05)。結論:氫嗎啡酮聯閤芬太尼與單用芬太尼用于頜麵部手術術後鎮痛的效果相噹,但不良反應髮生率明顯較低,更適用于頜麵部手術術後鎮痛。
목적::평개경마배동연합분태니용우합면부수술환자술후자공정맥진통적효과。방법:40례택기행합면부수술적환자수궤분위경마배동+분태니(H)조화분태니(F)조,매조20례。량조술후균채용환자정맥자공진통적방식,F조분태니1.0mg;H조경마배동1.6mg+분태니0.5mg,기록술후2h、4h、8h、12h、24h적동통평분(VAS평분)화Ramsay진정평분(RSS평분),관찰악심、구토、현훈등불량반응적발생정황。결과:량조환자술후각시간점VAS평분、RSS평분비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。진통치료기간H조환자악심구토、현훈적발생솔명현저우F조(P<0.05)。결론:경마배동연합분태니여단용분태니용우합면부수술술후진통적효과상당,단불량반응발생솔명현교저,경괄용우합면부수술술후진통。
[ABSTRACT]Objective:To evaluate the effects of hydromorphone combined fentanyl on postoperative patient control intravenous analgesia (PCIA) of maxillofacial surgery patients. Methods:40 cases selective maxillofacial surgery patients were randomly divided into hydromorphone combined fentanyl (H) group and fentanyl (F) group (n=20). These 2 groups all used PCIA:patients in H group used hydromorphone (1.6mg) combined fentanyl (0.5mg);patients in F group only used fentanyl(1.0mg). The VAS score and RSS score of patients in 2 groups were recorded 2h, 4h, 8h, 12h, 24h after operation respectively;as well as adverse effects. Results:There had no statistical signiifcance about VAS score and RSS score of 2 groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). The incidence rate of adverse effects (nausea, vomiting and dizziness) of H group were obviously lower than that of F group (P<0.05). Conclusions:The analgesic effects of hydromorphone combined fentanyl is same as fentanyl after maxillofacial surgery, but adverse effects are fairly lower. So hydromorphone combined fentanyl is more comfortable and safer for maxillofacial surgery.