中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
1期
48-50
,共3页
子母补泻配穴法%肩关节周围炎%临床疗效
子母補瀉配穴法%肩關節週圍炎%臨床療效
자모보사배혈법%견관절주위염%림상료효
The Zimu Buxie therapy%Periarthritis%Clinical effect
目的：比较子母补泻配穴法与患肢局部取穴法治疗肩周炎疼痛期的疗效差异。方法：将60例患者随机分为观察组和对照组，每组30例，观察组根据病证的虚实，针刺穴取手三阳经的子穴、母穴治疗。对照组针刺穴取患侧肩周局部穴位肩三针为主穴，并配合患肢循经取穴。两组均隔日治疗1次，10次为1个疗程。治疗1个疗程后观察两组治疗前后Constant Murley肩关节评分系统，并进行临床疗效评定。结果：观察组痊愈率优于对照组。观察组有效率93.33%亦优于对照组83.33%。两组治疗后Constant Murley评分以及其中的关节活动度评分均较治疗前明显改善。观察组治疗后以上评分较对照组改善更明显。结论：对于肩周炎疼痛期的患者子母行补泻配穴法可明显改善疼痛及临床症状，痊愈率高，疗效优于患肢局部取穴法。
目的：比較子母補瀉配穴法與患肢跼部取穴法治療肩週炎疼痛期的療效差異。方法：將60例患者隨機分為觀察組和對照組，每組30例，觀察組根據病證的虛實，針刺穴取手三暘經的子穴、母穴治療。對照組針刺穴取患側肩週跼部穴位肩三針為主穴，併配閤患肢循經取穴。兩組均隔日治療1次，10次為1箇療程。治療1箇療程後觀察兩組治療前後Constant Murley肩關節評分繫統，併進行臨床療效評定。結果：觀察組痊愈率優于對照組。觀察組有效率93.33%亦優于對照組83.33%。兩組治療後Constant Murley評分以及其中的關節活動度評分均較治療前明顯改善。觀察組治療後以上評分較對照組改善更明顯。結論：對于肩週炎疼痛期的患者子母行補瀉配穴法可明顯改善疼痛及臨床癥狀，痊愈率高，療效優于患肢跼部取穴法。
목적：비교자모보사배혈법여환지국부취혈법치료견주염동통기적료효차이。방법：장60례환자수궤분위관찰조화대조조，매조30례，관찰조근거병증적허실，침자혈취수삼양경적자혈、모혈치료。대조조침자혈취환측견주국부혈위견삼침위주혈，병배합환지순경취혈。량조균격일치료1차，10차위1개료정。치료1개료정후관찰량조치료전후Constant Murley견관절평분계통，병진행림상료효평정。결과：관찰조전유솔우우대조조。관찰조유효솔93.33%역우우대조조83.33%。량조치료후Constant Murley평분이급기중적관절활동도평분균교치료전명현개선。관찰조치료후이상평분교대조조개선경명현。결론：대우견주염동통기적환자자모행보사배혈법가명현개선동통급림상증상，전유솔고，료효우우환지국부취혈법。
Objective: To compare the Zimu Buxie therapy and limb local points method for difference. Methods: 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups, 30 cases for each. The observation group was given acupuncture at Zi points and Mu points of Shousan Yang; the control group was given acupuncture at Jiansanzhen point plus along Jing locat points. 10 times for one course, qod. Constant Murley score was observed; clinical effect was evaluated. Results: The improvement efficacy in the observation (93.33%) was better than (83.33%) in the control, and the efficacy in the observation was better. Constant Murley score and joint activity score were improved better. Conclusion: The Zimu Buxie therapy shows obvious effects on Periarthritis pain, and was better.
