口腔材料器械杂志
口腔材料器械雜誌
구강재료기계잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF DENTAL MATERIALS AND DEVICES
2015年
1期
32-35,56
,共5页
侧副根管%AH-plus糊剂%赛普敦美松糊剂%慢性根尖炎
側副根管%AH-plus糊劑%賽普敦美鬆糊劑%慢性根尖炎
측부근관%AH-plus호제%새보돈미송호제%만성근첨염
Lateral accessory canal%AH-plus paste%Endomethasone ivory%Chronic periapical periodontitis
目的：观察2种根管充填糊剂充填慢性根尖炎侧副根管的治疗效果。方法：选择术后X线片显示有侧副根管的慢性根尖炎病例54例，随机分为AH-plus组和赛普敦组，每组27例。开髓、揭顶、去除牙本质肩领，应用逐步后退法进行根管预备，氢氧化钙糊剂根管封药消毒，分别选用AH-plus糊剂和赛普敦（SEPTODONT）美松根管充填糊剂，热牙胶连续波垂直加压充填技术进行根管充填。比较根尖1/3侧副根管充填率、治疗一年后根管治疗成功率和感染控制率。结果：AH-plus组根尖1/3侧副根管充填率为62.96%，根管治疗成功率为88.89%，感染控制率为96.30%，分别高于赛普敦组的37.04%、66.67%和74.07%，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：AH-plus糊剂较赛普敦美松糊剂对侧副根管充填的疗效好。
目的：觀察2種根管充填糊劑充填慢性根尖炎側副根管的治療效果。方法：選擇術後X線片顯示有側副根管的慢性根尖炎病例54例，隨機分為AH-plus組和賽普敦組，每組27例。開髓、揭頂、去除牙本質肩領，應用逐步後退法進行根管預備，氫氧化鈣糊劑根管封藥消毒，分彆選用AH-plus糊劑和賽普敦（SEPTODONT）美鬆根管充填糊劑，熱牙膠連續波垂直加壓充填技術進行根管充填。比較根尖1/3側副根管充填率、治療一年後根管治療成功率和感染控製率。結果：AH-plus組根尖1/3側副根管充填率為62.96%，根管治療成功率為88.89%，感染控製率為96.30%，分彆高于賽普敦組的37.04%、66.67%和74.07%，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論：AH-plus糊劑較賽普敦美鬆糊劑對側副根管充填的療效好。
목적：관찰2충근관충전호제충전만성근첨염측부근관적치료효과。방법：선택술후X선편현시유측부근관적만성근첨염병례54례，수궤분위AH-plus조화새보돈조，매조27례。개수、게정、거제아본질견령，응용축보후퇴법진행근관예비，경양화개호제근관봉약소독，분별선용AH-plus호제화새보돈（SEPTODONT）미송근관충전호제，열아효련속파수직가압충전기술진행근관충전。비교근첨1/3측부근관충전솔、치료일년후근관치료성공솔화감염공제솔。결과：AH-plus조근첨1/3측부근관충전솔위62.96%，근관치료성공솔위88.89%，감염공제솔위96.30%，분별고우새보돈조적37.04%、66.67%화74.07%，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론：AH-plus호제교새보돈미송호제대측부근관충전적료효호。
Objective To observe the short-term clinical effect of two root canal sealers on lateral accessory canals obturation of teeth with chronic periapical periodontitis. Method A total of 54 teeth with periapical periodontitis and lateral accessory canals were randomly divided into two groups of 27 teeth:AH-plus group and Septodont group. After coronal cavity preparation , debridement and root canal preparation by step-back technique, the root canals were filled using continuous-wave condensation technique with AH-plus paste (AH-plus group) and Endomethasone ivory (Septodont group). The percentage of lateral accessory canals fillings, the success rate of root canal treatment and infection control after 1 year were compared between the two groups. Result The percentage of lateral accessory canals fillings of AH-plus group and Septodont group was respectively 62.96%and 37.04%, and there was significant difference between them(P<0.05). The success rate of root canal treatment and infection control of AH-plus group and Septodont group were respectively 88.89%vs 66.67%, and 96.30%vs 74.07%, and there were significant differences between them(P<0.05). Conclusion AH-plus paste was proved to have better sealing effects than Endomethasone ivory.
