中国循环杂志
中國循環雜誌
중국순배잡지
CHINESE CIRCULATION JOURNAL
2015年
2期
116-118
,共3页
楚新梅%何秉贤%戴晓燕%吴永健
楚新梅%何秉賢%戴曉燕%吳永健
초신매%하병현%대효연%오영건
冠心病%胰岛素抵抗%腰臀比%胆固醇
冠心病%胰島素牴抗%腰臀比%膽固醇
관심병%이도소저항%요둔비%담고순
Coronary artery disease%Insulin resistance%Waist-to-hip ratio%Cholesterol
目的:比较分析冠心病住院患者不同胰岛素抵抗水平下多种危险因素的分布特点。
<br> 方法:选取住院患者203例,其中冠心病患者132例(冠心病组);对照组71例,并根据对照组71例患者的胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA IR)四分位值[25百分位(1.53),50百分位(3.46),75百分位(5.14)]将132例冠心病患者分为四组:即:HOMA IR≤1.53为第一组(n=28);HOMA IR:1.54~3.46为第二组(n=25);HOMA IR:3.47~5.13为第三组(n=28);HOMA IR≥5.14为冠心病胰岛素抵抗组(第四组,n=51)。运用稳态模式法评价胰岛素抵抗对冠心病多种危险因素分布的影响。
<br> 结果:第四组与第一组比较,体重、腰臀比、腰围、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、空腹血糖水平、餐后2 h血糖水平及空腹胰岛素水平均增加;与第二组比较,空腹总胆固醇、LDL-C、空腹血糖水平、餐后2 h血糖水平及空腹胰岛素水平均增加,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05~0.01)。
<br> 结论:体重和腰臀比增加、LDL-C、总胆固醇升高是该地区冠心病合并胰岛素抵抗住院患者的主要特征。
目的:比較分析冠心病住院患者不同胰島素牴抗水平下多種危險因素的分佈特點。
<br> 方法:選取住院患者203例,其中冠心病患者132例(冠心病組);對照組71例,併根據對照組71例患者的胰島素牴抗指數(HOMA IR)四分位值[25百分位(1.53),50百分位(3.46),75百分位(5.14)]將132例冠心病患者分為四組:即:HOMA IR≤1.53為第一組(n=28);HOMA IR:1.54~3.46為第二組(n=25);HOMA IR:3.47~5.13為第三組(n=28);HOMA IR≥5.14為冠心病胰島素牴抗組(第四組,n=51)。運用穩態模式法評價胰島素牴抗對冠心病多種危險因素分佈的影響。
<br> 結果:第四組與第一組比較,體重、腰臀比、腰圍、低密度脂蛋白膽固醇(LDL-C)、空腹血糖水平、餐後2 h血糖水平及空腹胰島素水平均增加;與第二組比較,空腹總膽固醇、LDL-C、空腹血糖水平、餐後2 h血糖水平及空腹胰島素水平均增加,差異均有統計學意義(P均<0.05~0.01)。
<br> 結論:體重和腰臀比增加、LDL-C、總膽固醇升高是該地區冠心病閤併胰島素牴抗住院患者的主要特徵。
목적:비교분석관심병주원환자불동이도소저항수평하다충위험인소적분포특점。
<br> 방법:선취주원환자203례,기중관심병환자132례(관심병조);대조조71례,병근거대조조71례환자적이도소저항지수(HOMA IR)사분위치[25백분위(1.53),50백분위(3.46),75백분위(5.14)]장132례관심병환자분위사조:즉:HOMA IR≤1.53위제일조(n=28);HOMA IR:1.54~3.46위제이조(n=25);HOMA IR:3.47~5.13위제삼조(n=28);HOMA IR≥5.14위관심병이도소저항조(제사조,n=51)。운용은태모식법평개이도소저항대관심병다충위험인소분포적영향。
<br> 결과:제사조여제일조비교,체중、요둔비、요위、저밀도지단백담고순(LDL-C)、공복혈당수평、찬후2 h혈당수평급공복이도소수평균증가;여제이조비교,공복총담고순、LDL-C、공복혈당수평、찬후2 h혈당수평급공복이도소수평균증가,차이균유통계학의의(P균<0.05~0.01)。
<br> 결론:체중화요둔비증가、LDL-C、총담고순승고시해지구관심병합병이도소저항주원환자적주요특정。
Objective: To comparatively analyze the multiple risk factor distribution for different level of insulin resistance (HOMA IR) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
<br> Methods: A total of 203 in-hospital patients were divided into 2 groups, CAD group, n=132 and Control group, n=71. According to the quartile value of HOMA IR, the patients in Control group were further divided as following: 25th percentile (1.53), 50th percentile (3.46) and 75th percentile (5.14). The patients in CAD group were further divided into 4 sub-groups:①HOMA IR ≤ 1.53, n=28, ②HOMA IR: 1.54-3.46, n=25, ③HOMA IR: 3.47-5.13, n=28 and ④ HOMA IR ≥5.14, n=51. The multiple risk factors of insulin resistance in CAD patients were studied by Homeostasis model assessment.
<br> Results: In CAD group, the weight, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist circumference, LDL-C, fasting glucose, 2h glucose and fasting insulin level were increased in Sub-group④ than Sub-group①; the fasting TC, LDL-C, fasting glucose, 2h glucose and fasting insulin level were increased in Sub-group④than Sub-group②, P<0.05-0.01.
<br> Conclusion: The elevated weight, WHR and LDL-C level were the major features of insulin resistance in CAD patients at that area.